User talk:BB3132

April 2019

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to PDF. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 06:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mya 2019

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to EXSLT. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kuru (talk) 15:37, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

theyouth.com.pk: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.theyouth.com.pk

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Vishal Bharti Public School. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. --Ronz (talk) 16:10, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CreditDigital (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Declining; the draft does not cite the necessary quality, in-depth, independent coverage needed to meet WP:NCORP; indeed, most of the articles sourcing is derived from press releases, trivial mentions, and routine business announcements, all of which do not confer notability on a subject per NCORP. The 'best' source cited is a opinion piece written by a forbes subscriber (the site goes out of its way to note subscriber's "opinions are their own") and thus is not reliable. The COI/UDP issues imply this article is in violation of WP:NOTADVERTISING as well.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CreditDigital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:CreditDigital, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 06:56, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BB3132! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 06:56, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please stop removing maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:CreditDigital, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Given other, similar warnings you have received, I am issuing you a level three warning to start off with; do not remove maintenance templates without at least explaining why. SamHolt6 (talk) 06:59, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for using Wikipedia for advertising. You have been told more than once that doing so is not acceptable, but you have continued doing so. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I have increased your block to indefinite because you have abused multiple accounts and engaged in undeclared paid advocacy. MER-C 17:31, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]