User talk:BAmonster

Tianchi/Chonji

If you look at the talk page, there was a vote and consensus to keep the article at Chonji. Don't move without discussing and getting a new consensus, please. Please undo other related changes. BAmonster 06:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop repeatedly moving the article against the consensus. The vote was clearly against moving Chonji to Tianchi. If you want a new discussion and a new vote, go ahead, but you're being very disruptive by unilaterally and repeatedly renaming the article. BAmonster 06:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the page history, you'll see it was moved from Tianchi to Chonji without consensus. Please use the article talk page to discuss your edits and move the talk page back. You can reply here. LionheartX

After it was named Chonji, there was a full discussion of the common English name and disambiguation considerations. Then, people voted for keeping Chonji and against move to Tianchi. That's where things stand now, unless you want to begin another discussion and another vote, which you haven't. Stop renaming against consensus. BAmonster 07:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page was moved out of process. See the comments in the talk page. LionheartX

Your reverts on Tianchi Lake

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Tianchi Lake. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. LionheartX

That lake in North Korea

In order to stabilise the article title once and for all, I have instigated a move request at Talk:Cheonji lake. The current title is untenable, and there are many possibilities to choose from. Please calmly voice reasons for and against each title there. --Stemonitis 08:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]