User talk:BAU 13

Welcome!

Hello, BAU 13, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 30 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Draft:Pamela Price page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pamela Price (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not notable for WP:POLITICIAN and I see no notability as a lawyer, and there's no significant notability in Wikipedia policy to suggest accepting; there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone else.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pamela Price and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:09, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pamela Price (December 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft cites some journalistic, independent, reliable sources: San Francisco Bay View, The San Francisco Chronicle, KRON, and The Denver Post. The problem is that the coverage is routine and not deep (the last doesn't even mention Price). Attorneys making brief statements to the press about their cases is just lawyers doing their job, it is not an indication that independent sources find that lawyer noteworthy enough to write about their life in depth.

You've been directed to WP:BIO before, but the draft suggests you haven't grasped it yet. You may find it useful to study examples of good biographies of lawyers:

Note the range and depth of the sources referenced. Quality is far more important than quantity.

Your chosen topic is not entirely hopeless. Appearing on the ACLU list is something, although she's there in her role as a plaintiff, and such lists aren't given a great deal of weight on Wikipedia unless sources independent of the 'recipient' and of the 'awarding' organization have covered them. Perhaps detailed press coverage exists of her role in the case argued before the Supreme Court or of her failed run for the State Assembly.

If you are able to find sources to establish notability, you'll then have to address several other major problems with the draft: WP:POV, undue weight, and a degree of WP:COATRACK. An article cannot say in Wikipedia's voice, for example, that she is a "survivor" of Ohio systems. The long lists of endorsements must be removed, as well as the list of awards unless they can be shown to be significant. The selection of cases for the notable cases section needs justification, particularly the recent ones.

Writing a new article is one of the most difficult, frustrating, and time-consuming ways of contributing to Wikipedia. If you're interested in writing about law, you may find it easier to improve poor existing articles, such as Ann Olivarius, or write an article whose notability is unlikely to be challenged, such as National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan. After gaining some practical experience, revisit whether the draft is salvageable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pamela Price and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Worldbruce (talk) 04:13, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! BAU 13, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Worldbruce (talk) 04:13, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pamela Price (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not satisfying the applicable standards and there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pamela Price and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 20:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pamela Price (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Innisfree987 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi and thanks for your submission! In order qualify for an entry in the encylopedia, a topic needs "significant" coverage in secondary sources--the link about notability above gives more detail about what this means. If more secondary sources are available, please do add them and resubmit! Happy editing Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pamela Price and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pamela Price has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pamela Price. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 21:08, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pamela Price (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Biochemistry&Love was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please use inline citations for living subjects. E.g., the statement "As a youth, Price was active in the civil rights movement" does not have a citation supporting the claim.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pamela Price and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

―Biochemistry🙴❤ 23:24, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pamela Price concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pamela Price, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pamela Price concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pamela Price, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]