Jump to content

User talk:Alice Angstrom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:BASISeditor)

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, BASISeditor! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 13:56, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your username

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created BASIS Schools, and I noticed that your username, "BASISeditor", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing this form, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 13:59, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peaceray,
I believe my user name does not violate your policy, because it identifies me as an individual. I am an editor for BASIS, so I think "BASISeditor" should still comply under your conditions, right? Please let me know if I am misunderstanding or you still believe it may violate your policy.
I will not share my credentials with anyone else, and I will contribute only in an unbiased manner, using factual information and cited sources.
Best,
BASISeditor (talk) 16:49, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your beliefs about your username are incorrect -- needs to be changed. In addition, your assurances are not enough, that fact that you only edit articles connected with BASIS indicates that you probably have a conflict of interest. Please read WP:COI to understand what steps you must take as an editor with a conflict of interest.
If you do not change your name, continue to edits these artitlces alone, and shows signs of violating WP:NPOV by pushing a particular point of view (POV), it is likely that you will be blocked from editing at some point. To stop this, please change your name (go to WP:CHU) and edit within Wikipedia's policies. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:14, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:BASIS Scottsdale Logo 2013.png

[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

[edit]

un

Hello, BASISeditor. Concerns have been raised that your username may be incompatible with policy. You can contribute to the discussion about it at the page for requests for comment on usernames. Alternatively, if you agree that your username may be problematic and are willing to change it, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name. Simply request a new name at Wikipedia:Changing username following the guidelines on that page, rather than creating a whole new account. Thank you. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 18:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC) --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 18:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:BASISeditor, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=BASISeditor|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BASISeditor -- It appears yours is a single-purpose account. Please refer to Wikipedia:Single-purpose_account. You are making changes without citation, changes that are consistent with that of a paid PR person. Rhadow (talk) 01:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:21, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Alice Angstrom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23165 was submitted on Nov 06, 2018 22:55:52. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 22:55, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

break to make page more manageable

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Alice Angstrom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I joined Wikipedia on Oct 16, and received a notice in Oct 18 that my username may be in violation because it represents a business, not an individual. I replied that I am an editor at BASIS and felt it did identify me individually and requested that I be corrected if I was wrong. After receiving messages from other users on Nov 5 to change my name, I immediately requested a name change; however my request was denied, as it was similar to another user's username. By that time, I had been blocked and have not been able to request another change of username. I am very happy to do so if I am unblocked. I am also happy to add a "paid" disclosure, since I am an employee at BASIS. Further more, I have been warned about single-purpose editing. I would love to contribute to other unrelated pages that interest me; this is just where I chose to start after noticing inaccuracies and missing info. I have also been accused of using bias. I have attempted to include only factual info and citations for all info. While I am including positive news articles, I have not removed the negative articles or criticisms. I will be diligent in sourcing, citing, and not using biased language. I did add to the pre-existing rankings section, which refers to BASIS Schools on the Best High Schools rankings, but cited the reputable news sources. Please let me know if that is an issue and, if so, how to remedy it. Also, I was warned about changing the stylistic capitalization of BASIS, and I am not sure I understand how this differs from "iPad" or "iPod" pages. I do not want to violate terms of use, only to provide accurate information. Please pardon my ignorance and learning curve. Please reconsider this block and help me improve my content.

Accept reason:


Hi there. I am happy to change my username to something completely unrelated (i.e., Alice Angstrom, if accepted). I greatly regret choosing it all all, and did so to create transparency and identity. I do see that I was wrong in selecting it, but I am currently unable to change it while blocked. As I mentioned, I did attempt to change after seeing the related messages, but my requested name was not accepted, and by then I had been blocked. Would I be allowed to edit BASIS articles if I add the previously suggested "paid" disclosure and steer far from promotional language? Establish a more neutral POV? And also include other POVs? Thanks BASISeditor (talk) 17:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello. I am the admin who blocked your account (as explained above). I see that Dlohcierekim has already renamed your account, and so I am going to unblock you now. Please add the required paid contribution disclosures to your user page as necessary. Please see the instructions at Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure#How to disclose, or in a nutshell:
    • add {{paid|user=Alice Angstrom|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}} to your user page (you will have to create one)
    • add {{Connected contributor (paid)|User1=Alice Angstrom|U1-employer=InsertName|U1-client=InsertName}} to the talk page of any article you edit in exchange for compensation of any kind (i.e. Talk:Basis Schools)
If you need help with these templates please let us know. You may wish to read our plain and simple guide to conflict of interest. You should not edit articles related to your employer directly, but please see our process for requesting an edit to those articles. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As for your question about capitalization, this is discussed in our manual of style on trademarks which essentially say that for stylized initialisms of this sort, we follow the usual rules of common English capitalization (capitalize the first letter only - see also MOS:TMSTYLE). Trademarks that properly start with one lowercase letter followed by a capitalized second letter (e.g. eBay, iPod) is a special case, explained further down that page. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:51, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assistance and for the opportunity to improve. Alice Angstrom (talk) 21:20, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

further unblock discussion

[edit]

Hello BASISeditor -- Your first edit to Basis Schools was made 12 October 2018. It was an alteration of content without attribution -- changing the number of schools. In a series of edits following, you added the words "received accolades" and "earning the top five spots and more among the 2017 Best High Schools." You deleted the majority of another paragraph, claiming, "erroneous information describing the structure and duties of the BASIS business units." You are an employee of the subject. Your user name seeks to establish authority by naming the company.

A Wikipedia article is not intended as an adjunct to your company website or other marketing materials. Your addition solely of information favorable to the subject certainly appears biased. Wikipedia:NPOV would indicate adding text about about the questionable practice of Arizona locations asking for parental contributions to publicly-funded schools. Just because information is true doesn't make its inclusion Wikipedia:NPOV.

I announce my intention here to substantially edit the awards text in the article. There is no particular reason that half of the column inches in the article need to be devoted to WaPo and UNS&WR vanity awards.

I don't write about myself or my company to avoid even the appearance of Wikipedia:COI. I suggest you do the same. I agree with the block on your account. Rhadow (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm -- Dlohcierekim (talk) and I endorse this message.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:57, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed BASISeditor to Alice Angstrom

[edit]

globally renamed BASISeditor to Alice Angstrom -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alice, you've not completed your required disclosure, as your userpage is still a redlink. Be advised that although we allow paid editing, the vast majority of editors oppose it, some like myself strongly. Except for reverting clear VANDALISM (by our definition, not yours), you are strongly discouraged from directly editing any article connected with your company, and I for one will immediately revert any edit made by you without prior consensus. I've been battling COI editing on school articles for five years now, and frankly I think paid editing is despicable and totally contrary to the Wikipeda ethos. Your schools have been repeatedly criticized for excess profits. Spend that money on advertising if you wish, but hijacking a noble project like Wikipeda for your profit is foul, period. John from Idegon (talk) 22:28, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you have edited Basis Educational Group also. Your disclosure notice needs to be posted there and if you intend to edit the individual school articles, on those too. John from Idegon (talk) 22:46, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:AZCC BSI BCSI Name Amendment.pdf

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:AZCC BSI BCSI Name Amendment.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 17:45, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:AZCC BSI BCSI Name Amendment.pdf

[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alice_Angstrom&oldid=1043849252"