User talk:BAPASSPHD

December 2023

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Faruk Kabir have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 21:14, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just to let you know Faruk Kabir is not divorced from Rukhsar Rehman. Please don’t publish wrong information BAPASSPHD (talk) 04:34, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rukhsar Rehman have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 21:14, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As I said in Faruk Kabir wiki I am reporting again. Rukhsar and faruk are not divorced BAPASSPHD (talk) 04:36, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Faruk Kabir, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Schrödinger's jellyfish (talk) 04:26, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Rukhsar Rehman, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Schrödinger's jellyfish (talk) 04:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rukhsar Rehman, you may be blocked from editing. – 64andtim ^(talk) 04:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did with this edit to Rukhsar Rehman. ~~mAyLiNgOeEd (Talk to me!) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜) 04:38, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rukhsar Rehman is not divorced from Faruk Kabir. You are publishing wrong information BAPASSPHD (talk) 04:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BAPASSPHD: You did not include that in your edit summary nor updating the source, for more information, please see WP:BLP and WP:CITE ~~mAyLiNgOeEd (Talk to me!) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜) 04:47, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am from the legal team and if you’re publishing that they are divorced you give a proper document.It is morally and legally not correct to publish wrong information. BAPASSPHD (talk) 04:49, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if this is the case, you should have disclosed earlier that you had a conflict of interest (see more at WP:COIE).

From the plain COI guide:

"Do not edit or create articles about yourself, your family or friends, your organization, your clients, or your competitors."

While it's our goal to publish correct information, you will need to provide us a reliable, third party source that shows that they are not getting divorced. The edits that you are removing have sources, and yours do not. Schrödinger's jellyfish (talk) 04:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 05:16, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rukhsar Rehman is not divorced from Faruk kabir

Rukhsar Rehman is not divorced from Faruk Kabir BAPASSPHD (talk) 04:32, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if this is the case, please find a WP:RS that reflects that. You can also ask at the Teahouse if you need help finding a source. Schrödinger's jellyfish (talk) 04:33, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even true statements require verification via references. Your account now blocked. You can appeal the block with a promise that you will declare your WP:PAID connection on your User page and follow the rules for paid editors to propose changes to articles, meaning that you will be limited to proposing changes on the Talk pages of the relevant articles - with references - so that a non-involved editor can decide to incorporate or not. David notMD (talk) 09:35, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]