User talk:B3430715

Welcome!

I delete useless things on my talk page from time to time... Since I'm too lazy to learn how to use auto archive, You go check here for old things...

Edit War history

There used to be someone very very rude，who'd address himself alone as we and us.

That person had some conflicts with me, and send me to this ANI. Of course I did nothing wrong, but this person managed to write a lot! Accusing me with tons of things...
In the end, this person got a Indefinite block, by the wiki admin judgement.
Today, I really think (meaning no proof), that those "non-wiki admin, non-related" people who joined the 2 ANI events are one of this person's sock puppets.
Today, I thought not to delete this memory...BECAUSE,
I learned the importance of never delete ones calumniate while adding my response! --B3430715 (talk) 06:09, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Click to view some of my replies to this person...during that time...

== Columbo ==: I will make no more edits on this article before this person is done with his massive unplanned changes.; I will not work with SB who does what so ever on his will without agreements.User:B3430715

== ANI ==

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Response

Clearly, no body is at the mediation.

Clearly, the mediation is dead.

Clearly, Djathinkimacowboy himself withdrawn mediation and begins his edit on the article.

Clearly, Djathinkimacowboy is only there because I pointed out his error.

Clearly, he and I are the only two there.

Clearly, Djathinkimacowboy ain't reading my words while replying me.

Tell me, who does he mean by us (he and I ?), and had he talked to the other mediation members yet? B3430715 (talk) 22:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Response II

I'm not sure why would someone keeps scaring me with things such as "i will report to so and so"

I'm not sure why would someone keeps claiming himself as "we" when there's only "him" and "I"

I certainly knows about this "history" function that stores old pages. So why would someone thought of "deleted the evidence"....

It's my talk page, and i can keep it clean and light can i?

B3430715 (talk) 07:01, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed the AN/I discussion, and your recent edits, B3430715. My own view is that there is no admin action necessary right now, but I would suggest that you slow down a little and learn some of the conventions here at Wikipedia. I'm guessing that English is not your first language by edits such as this one. That's no problem, but it does mean that trying to make jokes, or be ironic, is going to be hard to do effectively and I'd recommend that you don't try. Keep your sentences in articles and talk pages simple, clear and direct. Your responses above were not in the right place (if anywhere, they belonged at AN/I) and were not really a helpful addition to the argument. Please assume good faith on the part of other editors and try to work collaboratively with them, even if you disagree with them. You do need to do a bit of work to understand some of our processes here, which are difficult enough to understand when your first language is English! So don't be impatient with others, but ask for help if you think something is not happening as it should. Best wishes, Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 19:07, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Judge Dee

Good move. I've edited that article and it hadn't occurred to me, but you're right it is about the various stories, not about either the fictional character himself (to any great extent) or the real judge. Since the article links to the article about the real "Judge Dee", there shouldn't be any need for further disambiguation. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 11:57, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Columbo Broadcast history

You, of course, can delete this section on Columbo broadcast history. But I just wanted to let you know in all fairness that if you don't respond to the concerns on the article's talk page, I may delete large portions of that article for being unreferenced. Thanks. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:22, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Monkey fight

My second edit war on Wikipedia. Ended up with me requesting a 3rd person to provide 3rd opinion to end my nightmare. While I violated WP:ELNO, at lest better then the one that violated WP:SOURCE, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL, WP:GNG, WP:SYNTH, WP:OR, WP:NPOV, WP:IRS ...--B3430715 (talk) 22:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Click to view some of my replies to this person...during that time...

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Xiaomi. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 04:02, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, you did/admitted an original research! --B3430715 (talk) 06:09, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Xiaomi, you may be blocked from editing. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:43, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Based upon your edit here [1] where you continue to add your own independent original research. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 18:24, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is my last warning? what about yours? last chance for changing your bias opinion? To error is human, but dictatorship over a bias opinion on wikipedia is unforgivable!

NO!

This is your last warning as well. ConcernedVancouverite, the next time you violate Wikipedia's NPOV policy by reverting/supporting/adding bias point of view into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice as well.--B3430715 (talk) 20:37, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Please note that I Cfd'ed Category:User sleep. I am a great fan of the template, but the category is against the rules for user categories. Debresser (talk) 21:07, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:ColumboDVD3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ColumboDVD3.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Cirt (talk) 06:35, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:B3430715/Userboxes/privacy

User:B3430715/Userboxes/privacy, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:B3430715/Userboxes/privacy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:B3430715/Userboxes/privacy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 06:40, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]