User talk:B1ertj3

Image copyright problem with File:Kalamassery emblem.png

Thanks for uploading File:Kalamassery emblem.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:40, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kalamassery Mahaganapathy temple

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kalamassery Mahaganapathy temple, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

There doesn't seem to be enough content here to demonstrate notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ray^Talk 05:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kashmir edits

Please read WP:NPOV and stick to a neutral editing style in future, especially on controversial subjects like Kashmir. We do not want to know your personal opinions on the matter. Whether anyone likes it or not, Azad Kashmir exists and Muzaffarabad lies within Pakistani jurisdiction. End of story. Green Giant (talk) 22:17, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:131068.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:131068.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:131068.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:131068.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:131068.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:131068.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:131068.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:131068.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:131068.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Nev1 (talk) 22:23, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jallikattu

Hi there, re: these edits, I have reverted them, because it's unclear to me why we're capitalising jallikattu. It's not a proper noun as far as I can tell. It's not a trademark, it's not the name of a place or a person. Why would we capitalise it? Also, the added editorial about how "popular" the campaign is, is just unwarranted. Our opinions don't belong in articles. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]