User talk:B1189199429080823K

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Come On, Let It Be Heard, Come On, Let It Be Known has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Come On, Let It Be Heard, Come On, Let It Be Known was changed by B1189199429080823K (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2014-01-12T22:41:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:41, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Mehmed Kapetanović. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Josh3580_talk/hist 00:44, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Nezir Škaljić

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because titles do not normally appear in lead paras. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Greenmaven (talk) 02:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "B1189199429080823K", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because Your user name is a random string of numbers and letters and is considered disruptive. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Please consider a user name change. --MrScorch6200 (t c) 04:04, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Demir

Why do I have a feeling that this account belongs to the recently blocked Demir Bajraktarevic? It was created a day after DemirBajraktarevic was blocked for 3 months, and its owner apparently has exactly the same areas of interests (and exactly the same Cyrillic-related misconceptions) as DemirBajraktarevic. I hope the administrator Bbb23, who blocked DemirBajraktarevic, will be able to prove that I am being paranoid. Surtsicna (talk) 19:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who you are or who that user is. and you cant make a new account when youre blocked. i think the ip gets blocked or something --B1189199429080823K (talk) 19:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Surtsicna: I wouldn't rule it out as a possibility, but I also wouldn't assert it. It is also unusual that a new editor created four decent pages within two days of being here. I'm an active NPP and can say this with certainty: pages from 95% of new editors are not written as well as these are, especially with infoboxes. And to B1189199429080823K, you can make another account if one of yours is already blocked. Maybe Bbb23 could weigh in here. --MrScorch6200 (t c) 20:21, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pinging me.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:46, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. --MrScorch6200 (t c) 22:50, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing. I have deleted all of the pages the account created. However, I have not touched his edits. You can feel free to revert any edit based on the socking determination, although if you find the edit constructive, nothing requires you to revert it.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:59, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I'll glance at them. --MrScorch6200 (t c) 23:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Most of them seem constructive, though I'm sure anyone watching those pages will deal with a problematic edit. Regards, --MrScorch6200 (t c) 23:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

block

why the fuck did i get blocked--B1189199429080823K (talk) 22:57, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are a suspected sock puppet. --MrScorch6200 (t c) 22:59, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, B1189199429080823K. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. --MrScorch6200 (t c) 20:23, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aristotel Petrović

Hello B1189199429080823K,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Aristotel Petrović for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Nechlison (talk) 20:46, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 22:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]