User talk:Bảo Ngậu

This user may have left Wikipedia. Bảo Ngậu has not edited Wikipedia since October 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

July 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vietnamese exonyms has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vietnamese exonyms was changed by Bảo Ngậu (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2017-07-09T17:57:01+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on The Chronicles of Narnia: The Silver Chair

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:13, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nguyễn Khản

Thanks for creating this interesting articles. Could you please add your source(s)? All articles need these and the WP:BURDEN is on the creator. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 12:37, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve La Thoại Tân

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Bảo Ngậu, thanks for creating La Thoại Tân!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please WP:INLINECITE all the references on this. It will be very hard for anyone else to do, and without it, it's difficult for readers to use the article for research. Thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello, I'm Dl2000. An edit that you recently made to La Thoại Tân seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dl2000 (talk) 22:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Arbitrator (Vietnamese drama series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 11:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:AussieLegend. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. AussieLegend (✉) 11:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make edits like this again. Your edits reintroduced multiple errors that had already been fixed here. These errors are too numerous to list all of them but included:
addition of infobox fields that do not exist in {{infobox television}}
improper use of infobox fields that do exist
incorrectly formatting the infobox
improper use of flags in the infobox
violation of WP:REDNOT
listing crew, which we generally do not do in TV articles
improper headings in the cast section
improper use of bolding per MOS:BOLD
excessive and unnecessary use of italics
improper listing in the cast section per MOS:TV - for example we do not use ellipses, we use "as"
improperly linking dates
invalid date formats per MOS:DATE
inclusion of an unnecessary "See also" section - See also sections should not include links that are already linked in the article or links to articles that do not exist - See WP:SEEALSO
Unnecessary/improper formatting in {{reflist}}

Your edits also resulted in the article being added to Category:Pages using infobox television with unknown parameters, a category used to identify articles in which {{Infobox television}} is used with errors. All of the edits in the article were previously fixed. By all means add or remove content appropriately and as necessary but please do not reintroduce the multiple errors that were corrected. Please ensure that you follow the Manual of Style. Thank you. --AussieLegend (✉) 11:34, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at The Arbitrator (Vietnamese drama series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Darkness Shines (talk) 11:34, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Personal attack for fixing article. AussieLegend (✉) 11:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Arbitrator (Vietnamese TV series). AussieLegend (✉) 13:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bảo Long

Your unproductive reversions of my repairs to Bảo Long are, at best, very rude. I see that you have been warned repeatedly for your rudeness. I'm informing you that I intend to make a report at either WP:AIV or WP:ANI. Pdfpdf (talk) 15:20, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:29, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you 1 week for personal attacks and edit warring. If there are any further personal attacks on the level of what you posted to User talk:AussieLegend, I will indefinitely block you. This is highly inappropriate and makes collaboration impossible. When you become involved in a dispute with an editor, you should discuss the problem civilly and gain consensus on an article's talk page. If you can't get consensus, Wikipedia has dispute resolution options available. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bảo Ngậu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Feature by medium has been nominated for discussion

Category:Feature by medium, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 02:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hồ Văn Trung has been nominated for deletion

Category:Hồ Văn Trung has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]