User talk:Aztap

AfD nomination of South Azerbaijan National Liberation Movement

An editor has nominated South Azerbaijan National Liberation Movement, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Azerbaijan National Liberation Movement and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 16:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove comments by other users on Articles for Deletion. All users may have a say in this disscussion, and it is not acceptable for you to remove anyone's comments except your own. Heimstern Läufer 06:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Please, do not delete votes of users, whether you like them or not. you undermine your case. that is if you want your article not to be deleted, please leave your comments, and arguments why you created this article and provide sources.thanks. Elsanaturk 02:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Wikipedia talk:Citing sources, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 06:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. An automated review of your submission has been completed, and revealed serious problems which will likely cause your submission to be declined. Your submission appears to be blank; you may have not fully submitted the text of your article. Your submission has not been declined yet, but this warning is to inform you that it will be declined within an hour if no changes are made to it. Don't worry, if your submission is declined you are always welcome to resubmit it after addressing its problems. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Snotbot t • c » 16:31, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shahrgon. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!

Speedy deletion nomination of Azerbaijanian emigrants to Canada

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Azerbaijanian emigrants to Canada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DanielRigal (talk) 22:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification: It is the empty article Azerbaijanian emigrants to Canada that is being deleted not the category of the same name. I assume you created the article by mistake when you were trying to make the category and won't mind. I am leaving the category. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:08, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of South Azerbaijan National Liberation Movement

A tag has been placed on South Azerbaijan National Liberation Movement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Alborz Fallah (talk) 17:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because...

1 - 30 million Azerbaijani Turks living in Iran for many years, and they are subjected to totalitarian oppression of the Iranian regime remain. It is the nation's national defense are a few of the national-political organization. Example: CAMAH, GAMOH, DAK and ...

2 - This page is related to the Persian chauvinism, nationality. Deletion request by some of the Iranian Fars for this article is FULLY biased! To make a decision about this article Please ask from Turkish, Azerbaijani, or other NON-PERSIAN nations.

3 - The previous time this article was deleted in a prejudiced by Persian. Please Do not run your biased opinion on Wikipedia!

4 - If you think this article should be delete, why Pesian, Turkish and Azeri versions still running on wikipediada? Even about (Azeri: GAMOH, Farsi: گاموح, English: Southern Azerbaijan National Awakening Movement

Aztap (talk) 19:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of South Azerbaijan National Liberation Movement for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South Azerbaijan National Liberation Movement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Azerbaijan National Liberation Movement (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GregJackP Boomer! 16:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aztap. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 04:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aztap (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I never have multiple accounts on Wikipedia and don't need it. If that is because of IP (maybe), my 21 years old son has an account on wikipedia. We are living in same house. If there is a problem whit this, let me I fix it. OR: I have an account on Wikimedia Commons for my uploads. If you are talking about this, I don't think so there should be any problem with this. If this is outside of Wikipedia's policy, I can deactivate or delete my account from Wikimedia Commons. Any way, I like and love the Wikipedia and don't want to get any unpleasant point here. Just help or tell me what can I do with this problem please!

Decline reason:

Since you're technically indistinguishable and edited in the same area, we have no way to tell one of you from another and have to treat you both as the same entity even if you're different people. Max Semenik (talk) 17:48, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with CAMAH flag. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 09:39, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sabir Rustamkhanli

Hello Aztap,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Sabir Rustamkhanli, may be copied from http://www.meclis.gov.az/?/en/deputat/108. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 01:24, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sabir Rustamkhanli

The article Sabir Rustamkhanli has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:59, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Azadliq Statue, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Azadliq Statue" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 23:10, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Shahrgon

Hello Aztap. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Shahrgon.

If you no longer want this submission, it will shortly be deleted. However, if you wish to keep it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shahrgon}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will place the undeleted submission in your user space.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:01, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Azadliq Statue listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Azadliq Statue. Since you had some involvement with the Azadliq Statue redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Aztap. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Piruz Dilenchi.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Piruz Dilenchi.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:32, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]