User talk:Azmarey

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Prince Of Roblox per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Prince Of Roblox. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 00:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Azmarey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't vandalised any page. You arr literally restoring edits made by nangparbat's socks. You literally removed sourced content from Hard Kaur's page that mentions she's an indian rapper and she made those controversial comments and labelled her as a Khalistani. You removed "Indian cuisine by region" in Category:Kashmiri cuisine but let the "Pakistani cuisine by region" stay. You reverted Bun Kebab as "a sandwich native to pakistan" which is literally unsourced, the other source clearly mentions it as native to Bhopal, India and hence Indian. You removed "Indian people by ethnicity" in "Category:Sindhi people" but let "Pakistani people by ethnicity" stay. The other accounts reporting me are pov-pushing pro-pakistani content and removing sourced content. Can I ask why this bias?

Decline reason:

CU verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 06:59, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Azmarey (talk) 06:55, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]