User talk:Azmarai76

GS Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions - such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks - on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

USaamo ^(t@lk) 07:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bro you have seen him youself he hasnt got no case now he says "Swatis are Pashtuns Culturally" earlier he was sure they are Bettanis… Azmarai76 (talk) 08:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes will see how long he will be bent on his stance but please follow the talk page guidelines while you discuss it there. WP:TALK USaamo ^(t@lk) 08:48, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i understand ... he comes with his own story books not even known even to mention only Olaf Caroe and Sher Muhammad Gandapur should have been enough they all have pointed in concealed or explicit manner as tajik tribe that got pashtunized. I have given him the genetic data also and what Afghan intellectuals at Kabul now think about them. They were indeed rulers in Swat but overthrown because they were from dehqan race of tajiks. Seems like this friend wants to keep his former royal status and become a Pashtun more than Pashtuns thrmselves. Something not possible. Azmarai76 (talk) 09:04, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm Austronesier. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pashtuns, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 06:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely I will Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 07:21, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Azmarai76 (talk) 07:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're looking for WP:DR and/or WP:ANI. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am Azmarai76 (talk) 19:14, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The matter is already under discussion on an admin's talkpage, you need to get Haider khan10 there and wait for the outcome. USaamo ^(t@lk) 12:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mirza Masroor Ahmad. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Majavah (talk!) 11:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am familiar with Wikipedia standard but seems like putting a dubious tag at some statement in the article is a problem. Leave Wikipedia alone atleast. Azmarai76 (talk) 11:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Take it to the talk page. Majavah (talk!) 11:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mirza Masroor Ahmad, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. PepperBeast (talk) 11:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't threaten it's against Wikipedia standards Azmarai76 (talk) 11:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That message is a standardized warning template to advise users of the consequences of further misbehaviour. —C.Fred (talk) 17:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Azmarai76 reported by User:Majavah (Result: ). Thank you. Majavah (talk!) 11:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Azmarai76 (talk) 11:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mirza Masroor Ahmad is covered by discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

See also WP:CALIPH for an explanation of the recent problems with Google trying to identify this guy as a Caliph. EdJohnston (talk) 19:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Mirza Masroor Ahmad

Hello Azmarai76. You've been warned for edit warring on this article. See the result of a complaint about you at the edit warring noticeboard. The next time you add another 'dubious' tag to the article, or place it in a maintenance category, without getting prior consensus on the talk page in your favor, you are risking a block. See WP:CALIPH for why this article has become a target, and try to avoid making the problem any worse. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Swati tribe

@Azmarai76: While you're right about warning User:Huzaifa Swati for abusive language, I now see ultra-nationalistic behaviour in your editing too especially with regards to Swatis. You know I agreed with your editing when it was based on sources to add their origin and even then there were behavioural issues which I gave a pass. I request you don't show battleground mentality while you edit here or I couldn't differentiate between you and these editors. Please watch out in this regard. Thanks!

As to that article, I left it last year after getting it protected but I still believe the neutral lede which was somewhat agreed back then should be added to it which will be followed by sources to both Pashtun and Tajik claims. But for this I think we need to start a new discussion and get more broader views in line with Wikipedia policy. Going to do something in this regard in coming week. USaamo ^(t@lk) 11:29, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to leave it the way it is and keep it locked. Else more and more will come get it in bad shape even more. Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 09:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't want to use abusive Language but this user Azmarai is urging me again and again to use abusive words Huzaifa Swati (talk) 13:48, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lock this user under vandalism

Please avoid vandalism by a frequent visitor to this page by locking. I have given the details and online links in the Further Readings section for easy access. I don't beling to this tribe nor am related in any sense but a few editors are childish activities here without even knowing they can even be confornted at Kripling Society and exposed .This user has no knowledge of history and editing other tribe pages with jealously . Kindly lock it Regards : Huzaifa Swati Huzaifa Swati (talk) 13:38, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning Azmarai76

Dekh mery bety Software Engineer hun ma Aur Khandan b sara software Engineers se bra Hai .Maine aj dekha tune mera page lock krwaya tha Dekhta hun tery sath sbr kr tu saly Huzaifa Swati (talk) 13:40, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jahangiri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jahangiri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jahangiri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:11, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Draft:Swati tribe has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:28, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view

Thank you for leaving a message on my talk page. I have no prior knowledge of the topic Swati tribe, but am concerned that you do not appear to be editing from a WP:Neutral point of view. I can see that you removed statements that you disagreed with even though they had citations.

Please only remove citations if they are not from WP:reliable sources. If multiple reliable sources present conflicting conclusions or complementary information, then both points of view should be presented on Wikipedia. – Fayenatic London 11:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I have very Nuetral point of view on this Dards are Indo Aryans while other than once reference noone has ever mentioned Dehgans as Dards. The modern genetic studies are there to back my assertion.

Azmarai76 (talk) 12:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion

Going through your objections over Swati article, I've a suggestion for you. The Swatis of 16th century were Dardic, but present Swatis probably identify themselves with Pashtuns. So I think you can create a separate article for present Swatis (who live in Cis-Hazara, as you stated) as oppose to the older Dardic Swatis (who lived in Swat). That would solve the issue. Hope you'd agree. Sutyarashi (talk) 04:20, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dards were never called Swatis as in their times the area was called Udhiyana I hope you would really read in between the lines and not get into edit wars with others like Gibri Sultan and Huzaifa as I see it.

Azmarai76 (talk) 04:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest we carry on this discussion where we are already discussing.

Azmarai76 (talk) 04:27, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sutyarashi (talk) 17:33, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have left my response and am collecting more to it for Notice board will take it up with other editors also as you suggested. Onus lies upon you now to clarify. Azmarai76 (talk) 08:16, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]