User talk:Azg20/Distinctive feature

I reviewed your article.

I reviewed your edits for the project and overall they are very good. Some constructive comments: in the first paragraph, I would leave the sentence 'These feature categories in turn are further specified on the basis of the phonetic properties of the segments in question.' and then I would add your edits after that. You only need to cite article [1] once though not after each system.

Paragraph 2. instead of 'but this theory', I would say 'and this theory'

There were a few reasons that Jakobson thought the best way to figure out the distinctive feature theory by using the binary approach I would take out this sentence because you don't currently clearly identify your reasons. I would just keep the second sentence.

I don't think you need to add the additional descriptions of the features, they are a little redundant. But your addition of citations is very good so keep those! Your description of strident, you use a lot of words that you don't define. Im' not sure they add much for an average reader. --Kim.riegel (talk) 18:45, 3 May 2021 (UTC)