User talk:Azdiyy

Hello Azdiyy! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Just H 02:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Muhammad

Welcome in wikipedia brother. Looks like you have good knowledge about Islam. However, all/most of your edits at Muhammad article has been reverted by some editors (they are no more there). I think the reason is that your edits have no references. Please provide references when you edit so that other people think before reverting them. Please join wikipedia project Islam Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam and help us in improving Islam related articles. There is lot of work required to make them quality articles. Please do not loose hope you will learn with time and will have better impact on the articles. I hope to see you around with good edits and with references. Let me know if you have any question. --- ALM 21:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello read above. --- ALM 21:24, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted all of your edits. Reason is given here [1]. Please talk to others. Provide references. Do NOT remove other people references. --- ALM 23:41, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Muhammad. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- tariqabjotu 23:50, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Dear Azdiyy thanks for your reply, at my talk page. We need more good editors like you. You are new please do not loose hope or take it wrongly. But please provide references otherwise other might revert your work. Please do not remove references provided by other people. See what people are saying while reverting your work by pressing history button (in the edit summaries). Use article talk page (like talk:Muhammad) more often to discuss your ideas of change. I am sorry that I have reverted your edits as I said earlier many were good one but your have removed references provided by other people and given no references with your edits. ---- ALM 23:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want to second ALM's statement above. You have a lot of potential as an editor, and some of your changes were very good. But you should proceed slowly on high-profile articles like this; before removing material or sources, discuss it first on talk. Non-controversial rewording is generally OK to do without discussion first, but if somebody reverts you, please come to talk to discuss it. - Merzbow 00:53, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]