User talk:Azazell0

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Phroziac (talk) 19:06, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Organic compounds

Hello, are you sure it is useful or necessary to fill this category with individual compounds? You want to put there every organic compound ? Maybe we should then consider creating new categories like "things" or so. I think it would be better if category "Organic compounds" would contain subcategories like hydrodarbons, esters, alkaloids, ... and the individual compounds would be sorted by these subcategories only. What do you think about it? Mykhal 02:14, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to say something similar. All those alkaloids you have placed in this category are organic by definition. JFW | T@lk 11:50, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A category is not only for browsing purposes, the category links themselves may contain useful information, too. For example, some layman may not know that caffeine, in fact, is an organic compound. (That's right.) So my stance is to include every organic molecule in the organic compounds category, but, of course, in its appropriate subcategories as well. However, if you like it so, let's do it your way - after all, you're more experienced in Wikipedia's editing customs. But that means we need to purge organic compounds from all specific molecules, since everything can be assigned to some subcategory. I'm just looking for some sort of uniformity here. (By the way, there were a few alkaloids, like dihydroquinine or dihydroquinidine which were assigned to organic compounds only.) -- Azazell0 13:31, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Categories do not serve the purpose you are using them for. They are for classification, not for giving information. If a molecule is an organic compound, this should be made clear in the article text. By the way, why would a reader be so desperate to learn whether a compound is organic or not? JFW | T@lk 16:05, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PS it is accepted policy that articles should not be in a parent and a subcategory at the same time, unless there are strong overriding arguments. JFW | T@lk

OK - you convinced me. After all, I'm a beginner. I'll take back the changes I made, and in the future will follow these rules, too. Do you agree with the second part of my last post?

By the way, maybe this is the page for all organic compunds?

Yeah, that is the main list (although probably incomplete). As for dihydroquinine or dihydroquinidine, you may have spotted correctly that these should really be in the "alkaloids" category.

Wikipedia:Category contains more information on the category system. Sometimes things aren't really clear-cut. Please leave a message on my talk page if you need any further help. JFW | T@lk 11:04, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi, thanks for contributing to the alkaloids sone helpful short pieces, such as hygrine - we need knowledgable chemists such as yourself contributing. I for one particularly appreciate you updating the list of organic compounds with your new entries. I would encourage you to look at the chemicals wikiproject, too. Keep up the good work, Walkerma 15:57, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Actors and Filmakers

Hey see my proposals at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Actor and Filmmakers and the main WP Film and Biography talk page. Know anybody who is interested? Actors and all film people articles need a body on wikipedia to upkeep them asthey need more focus -it would be a part of Biogrpahy and Film. If you are interested or know somebody who would be, please let them know and whether you think it is a good progession for the project or not. Please leave your views at the council or biogrpahy main talk page. THanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 14:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 17:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Azazell0. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]