User talk:Azaroth666
Appearance
This is Azaroth666's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Supreme Chaos Records (December 2)
[edit] Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Supreme Chaos Records and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Azaroth666!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:02, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
|
- @Dan arndt I have added external references. This was basically a translation from the German wikipedia article.
- I will post an update and hope it will contain more clues that will help. The question is what sources are considered relevant in the subcultural field. References like a major American distributor are actually almost an exception in the field. Azaroth666 (talk) 15:05, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Azaroth666, there is definitely a different/higher standard in respect to notability that applies to the English Wikipedia as opposed to other Wikipedias (see WP:GNG). Just to let you know Encyclopaedia Metallum is not considered a reliable source, as it is user generated content, with no independent editorial oversight. You need to find better more reliable sources. Dan arndt (talk) 02:57, 3 December 2024 (UTC)