User talk:Azam1993

January 2016

Hello, I'm Barek. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Link building, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Bonadea. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Backlink has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. bonadea contributions talk 21:35, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm EricEnfermero. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Studienkolleg have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. EricEnfermero (Talk) 23:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Usama Azam (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Usama Azam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:46, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Azam1993, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 14:46, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:47, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page.

Kuru (talk) 19:04, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Azam1993 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17035 was submitted on Dec 02, 2016 19:47:25. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have been Blocked by Wikipedia due to promotional reasons. I am very much ashamed and I appeal to please unblock my account. This is my hobby to edit pages on Wikipedia please I request you to unblock my account. Thanks !! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azam1993 (talk • contribs) 21:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I have been Blocked by Wikipedia due to promotional reasons. I am very much ashamed and I appeal to please unblock my account. This is my hobby to edit pages on Wikipedia please I request you to unblock my account. Thanks !!}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Azam1993 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked by Kuru for promotional purposes. I was just helping Wikipedia but I do not know that this is a spam. Please unblock my account and I will never do such things that lead to blocking of my account. I am very much ashamed please help me. Editing pages on Wikipedia and adding useful things is my Hobby. Please unblock my account.

Accept reason:

As below. Kuru (talk) 01:21, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since this account was created, you've

created a promotional biography for yourself
spammed your SEO site to 10 articles
inserted a spam referral link to a microsoft article
added promotional links to two other articles

Above, you say that you "do not know that this is a spam". These all seem to be blatantly self-promotional. I'm not sure I can find any evidence of "adding useful things". Can you point those out to me? Do you understand why the bulk of your edits were inappropriate? Kuru (talk) 22:29, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|1=I admit that have done spaming. Please give me one chance and I will not let you down again. Please one chance.}} You don't need to type each response in a new unblock request - normal text is fine. Can you indicate what type of edits you would make if unblocked? Kuru (talk) 01:01, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First of all I will remove my promotional biography and then I will add only useful data to wikipedia. And thanks for your kindness.

I've unblocked the account. Please note that any other promotional edits will result in block. Kuru (talk) 01:21, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. But let me know one thing. If I remove a broken link or fix it with a useful link will it also a promotional edit.

Your best bet right now would be to not add any more references or external links. The "I was just fixing a broken link" is the oldest SEO game in the book. Kuru (talk) 01:31, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I am clear now.

Your approach and attitude! Lucky that someone else got here first. I wasn't going to be that tolerant. I even suspect some socking. Sword of Damocles — billinghurst sDrewth 02:48, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you've added another spam link here, I've re-blocked the account. That's all the AGF unblocks I have in me. Kuru (talk) 02:01, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Link building, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Don't attempt to use Wikipedia to offer advice on SEO tactics (or other topics) bonadea contributions talk 16:33, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Usama Azam

Draft:Usama Azam, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Usama Azam and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Usama Azam during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KURU Hi there, you have blocked me again. But how can I make you believe that I am not doing any promotion. I swear to God that http://www.limitlessreferrals.info is my Blog. And I am not adding this. This is the promotion if I add this. I have founded a useful link http://www.shopanta.com/ and added it in Anta Sports so people can buy from their store. What kind of a promotion that is. And for your information I did not only add this information instead I have made lots of other useful edits. Please try to understand I am not doing any Promotion. Waiting for your response.

It's not their store, and you know it. Kuru (talk) 12:59, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If it is so, then their are lots of External links on Wikipedia which are not the official links. Then you also have to remove them all. I will mention you one by one and you have to remove them. Is it Okay ? Then I think that you have done fair to me.

I am not looking for your approval. Good luck. Kuru (talk) 14:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]