User talk:Ayelis

A kitten for you!

I'm Cute!(: Flirt?

GraceSmileyface (talk) 00:09, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Steven Mattison

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Steven Mattison, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GILO A&E⇑ 00:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Since your account hasn't edited in over a year, but today it performed vandalism at Steven Mattison, I've blocked it as potentially compromised. If it's not compromised, please explain the creation of that page. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to Criteria_for_speedy_deletion, subheading G10: Pages that disparage, threaten, intimidate or harass their subject or some other entity, and serve no other purpose be speedily deleted. By this logic, please delete any page edited by a supporter of GamerGate which disparages or harasses female-kind, according to the article posted as a reference within the page you have deleted. Also, since you have deleted the page, you risk legal action, also according to the page you have deleted. I have also contacted the appropriate channels regarding the donations according to the page you have deleted, so that is no longer an issue. Thanks. Ayelis (talk) 01:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's not an explanation, no, and withdraw your legal threats immediately. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:37, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm sorry, weren't you aware that people are allowed to edit and reedit their own pages now? According to this (which I had posted in the article which you have deleted), I'm allowed to edit pages about myself. Therefore that page, about myself, was created. And I quote:

"not only do the Gamergaters get to rewrite their own page ... feminists are to be purged en bloc from the encyclopedia"
— Alex Hern, The Guardian

Which means if you respect females as human beings, you should probably notify the administrators so they can purge you, en bloc. And by all means, if Gamergaters are not allowed to rewrite their own page, please let me know so that I understand the rules about rewriting pages about ourselves. But if they are, then please, reinstate my page about myself, and the redirect that leads to it. Thank you for your interest. Ayelis (talk) 23:34, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ayelis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Merely following the rules as established by the actions of the moderators of Wikipedia

Decline reason:

I'm almost sure there's a more valuable use of my time than dealing with passive-aggressive protest edits. Kuru (talk) 00:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ayelis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't get it guys. Why do some established editors get special treatment as far as the ability to create pages about themselves, while other established editors do not? I don't see what I've done wrong. Quit being passive-aggressive yourself and projecting your insecurities onto me.

Decline reason:

You're being disruptive in an attempt to make a point. In addition, you've made legal threats to others through the article and on your talk page here. As such, I've revoked your talk page access. Please submit any additional appeals to UTRS. Mike V • Talk 20:19, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.