User talk:Axomika

Indo-Aryan languages

Hi, Axomika. You may note that I reverted your recent edit to the above article. Apparently, you have found a fault with the language map of India, and have removed the otherwise useful map from the beginning of the article. Because the map is a useful one, the flaw you have found does not make the map worse than no map at all. The best way to deal with your discovery of a flaw in the map is to contact the WP user who made or uploaded the map, and discuss the matter on the talk page of the article. If you cannot contact the user responsible for the map, you may bring up your concerns by addressing them to all users on the article's talk page. If you reach consensus as to what should be done, then the map may be amended by someone qualified to do so, but not removed without replacement.--Quisqualis (talk) 06:57, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The map is incorrect and it is consensus that Maithili is not a dialect of Hindi as portrayed on the map. We will not allow our language to be misrepresented.14:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)14:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)~~

This discussion is about a map which you find inaccurate, and the remedies for such inaccuracy. It is not about whether Maithili is related to Hindi. Consensus on the map has not been reached, making your removal of the map from 2 WP pages improper. I described above two approaches to remedying the map problem, both of which take more time than summarily removing the map from the article.

It appears you have not attempted either approach I suggested. There is a third and more direct approach you may try, which is to "get it modified at the Graphics lab", which was suggested on the Talk page of Indo-Aryan peoples 11 months ago. Kindly undo your recent reversions and take one of these 3 courses of action. At the Graphics lab page, be sure to use the Subject/headline box and to add your request below the existing text in the Edit box. It is possible to have the map modified if you make your case politely and rationally. Good luck.

January 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. GMG ^talk 22:13, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 23:00, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Maithili in Indo-Aryan Languages Map

You can contact the author of the map Filpro here[[1]]. He replies fast and if you have authentic references that support your notion, he'd help. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your help!Axomika (talk) 21:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 05:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Indo-Aryan_languages, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. AshLin (talk) 11:17, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Above note is still an underestimation of your disruption. You are removing the map for the same fake reason on Indo-Aryan peoples [2] and you are also removing an image on Singh because you think that reinserting that image makes us look anti-Maithili.[3] Orientls (talk) 11:36, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Orientls:you can barely speak comprehensible English you illiterate. Don't both talking to me, I don't want to decipher any rubbish you have to spew.Axomika (talk) 16:11, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are using a bad English teacher for translating my comments and also for writing your own comments, otherwise what is "don't both talking"? Can you write even one proper sentence you illiterate? Your response also speaks of your overall incompetence. I will always warn you for disruption. Orientls (talk) 17:56, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Belated welcome

It appears that you aren't aware of the basic policies of Wikipedia. So I have added the welcome template as it gives you links which will help you get acquainted with the basic principles and policies. Kindly read these before getting involved in disputes in editing. They should help you contribute fruitfully to Wikipedia. AshLin (talk) 11:36, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Axomika, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! AshLin (talk) 11:32, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:45, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued unfounded accusations of racism and bigotry, after multiple requests to provided evidence.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jayron 32 17:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

After several editors politely asked you for diffs to back up your accusations of racism and bigotry, and warned you to not make such statements withoutu evidence, you immediately doubled down with this accusation. If you wish to be unblocked, just make a clear statement that you will not make such accusations in the future. It does not help reach a productive conclusion to the discussions at hand. You may possibly have even had a point about the inaccuracy of the map in question, but your abusive tone and unfounded accusations cause that message to be lost. Just retract your statements and agree to work cordially again, and you may be unblocked. --Jayron 32 17:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]