User talk:Axolotl21
| This user is a student editor in Cornell_University/BioEE1610_WIM_(Fall_2020) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Axolotl21, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:16, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
October 2022
[edit]
Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that in this edit to Lambda Upsilon Lambda, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hey @Hey man im josh:! Made the edit again with the appropriate summary. However, the parts edited are not public information and are also not correct by their history standards. The main issue is that some of the information presented is not supposed to be known or published since it goes against the integrity of the organizations and those mentioned in the page. Axolotl21 (talk) 18:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Axolotl21:! Some of the information that you removed (such as that included in the history section) were properly sourced with their references public. I went through and checked and it seemed like the information presented was correct. You seem to have a conflict of interest in regards to the article and continued disruption can lead to administrators banning you from making future edits. If the information is available publicly online, then it is not private information in actuality. - DovahDuck (talk) 18:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- @DovahDuck: After looking at some of the sources, they don't explicitly say anything. An example can be in the history, it's just referring back to all the organizations present, but the page says nothing about the organization's founding. Further, the national website of this org does not list this either. Thus, leading me to conclude it's just an issue of incorrect sources. A similar situation can be seen in the symbolism as the organization lists on their national website that the symbol/crest is something else with specific information on it. Axolotl21 (talk) 18:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- @DovahDuck: You have to sign your comment again in order for the ping to go through. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Axolotl21: Look at these three sources carefully, one explicitly talks about the organization's brief dive into being co-ed and the other two mention the founding of the organization. I also saw that another editor had more references as well on the page. Which seem to correspond the information present on the page.