User talk:Awilh37

User:Awilh37

THIS IS MY TALK PAGE!!!
Welcome and enjoy :)

Talk

Nice userpage :P Thriftycat ^{Talk • Contribs} 18:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ty also what other commands r there i want to learn them all😝 Awilh37 (talk) 18:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So the things in double braces {{Example}} are called templates. There are currently 618674 templates on Wikipedia. Thriftycat ^{Talk • Contribs} 19:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can find some of them at Wikipedia:Template index Thriftycat ^{Talk • Contribs} 19:06, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a useful template for making message boxes. Template:Tmbox Thriftycat ^{Talk • Contribs} 19:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

nice talk :p TheRomanian24 (talk) 20:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :p Awilh37 ^{Talk | Contribs} 18:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and please come back again soon!
--Awilh37 ^Talk

Hi! You recently removed an edit that I made, saying that I needed to cite a reference for my change, but it was not necessary for such a change as I made, as it was simply clarifying a misleading statement. The statement leads people to believe that the Anglican church is not Protestant, when in actuality, it very much is (https://www.britannica.com/topic/Anglicanism). I believe that the edit I made, while misinformed on actual formatting, is relevant and important to the content of the page, Christianity in the Ante-Nicene period, as it can be misleading to lump together the three churches of Catholic, Orthodox, and Anglican, while the first two are not protestant, and the third is one of the main denominations that spawned from the Protestant reformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.130.77.172 (talk) 21:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User!

Thank you for responding to my revert[1]. I viewed the source, and it does have credible authors. I will restore your edit, and add the source [2] you provided me with to the edit as well. In the future, when you make edits, please check that your source is included in the references section of the article.

Awilh37 ^{Talk | Contribs} 14:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit has been restored with proper citation. Thanks!

Awilh37 ^{Talk | Contribs} 14:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ulmus minor Umbraculifera Gracilis

Hi. You reverted my recent edit (fairly) because I didn't explain why I removed one doubtful herbarium specimen. I'll revert your "undo" and restore the specimen I removed. Everything else in my edit was just changing External links to inline citations, as requested by User:Kevmin, and eliminating duplication, with nothing else lost. User:Kevmin pointed out that herbarium specimens should be integrated into text as inline citations, not lumped together in External links which can also mean duplication. Am busy correcting the relevant articles in line with his request. Hope that's OK. 193.39.159.73 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.39.159.73 (talk) 13:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your explanation. This makes much more sense with context, and this edit was a difficult decision to revert. Thank you for your contributions, and have a great day! Awilh37 ^{Talk | Contribs} 18:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deleted specimen now restored to article:

Naturalis Biodiversity Center |id=L.1586951 Sheet described as U. carpinifolia Gled. cv. 'Gracilis' var. Späth; formerly known as 'U. montana umbraculifera gracilis' (Dahlem Hortus specimen, 1925)

Nothing else removed. Thanks, 193.39.159.73

What are you doing down here?

Stop now.

I said stop.

If you're not gonna stop, I'm just gonna be quiet.

●●●

... You're still here?

Ok then.

Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

User scrolled too far on Awilh37's talk page.

{whaleme}

January 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aaron (disambiguation). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Geardona (talk to me?) 11:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Geardona,

I hope you are enjoying your day. Thank you for reviewing my mistake. I was warning someone for vandalism, and I must have accidentally clicked the button for a double rollback. Thank you for catching it, and it will not happen again.

Thanks! Awilh37 ^{Talk | Contribs} 11:15, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Westminster and my talk page.

Hello. I am 94.10.105.239. I see you have reverted my edit on Westminster and claimed on my talk page that i didn't show why. On your save your changes page where you put a review, i said WP:CITELEAD, meaning i done it because of that page. If you read that page, you will find out that citations are not needed to be put in the lead. 94.10.105.239 (talk) 16:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Awilh37 94.10.105.239 (talk) 16:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 94.10.105.239

Thank you so much for the clarification, I will revert your edit later today. Awilh37 ^{Talk | Contribs} 16:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much 94.10.105.239 (talk) 16:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westminster&diff=1258580989&oldid=1258413885&diffmode=source#redirectLatestRevision Awilh37 ^{Talk | Contribs} 14:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]