User talk:Awat

Hi, Awat, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the Five pillars of Wikipedia and simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will be by to help you shortly.

Additional tips

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Five will get you the datestamp only.
You may want to add yourself to the new user log.
If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.
If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.

Happy Wiki-ing. —Kf4bdy ^talk ^contribs

PS: This is not a bot and you did nothing to prompt this message. This is just a friendly welcome by a fellow Wikipedian.

Click here to respond to this message!

I appreciate your feedback on various topics, but please kindly do not remove sourced material and do not remove entries from the Kurds template. Your point of view seems quite similar to another Iranian editor :). Do you have any source about the relation of Parthians and Kurds (Carduchis)? Thanks.Heja Helweda 23:54, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attacks????

The concept of vandalism is defined by wikipedia rules and is by no means a personal attack. Please make yourself familiar with the rules before threatening other contributers. Arash the Bowman 19:46, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But my edit which was inclusion of the word 'Turkic-speaking' to the article of Azerbaijanis in no way was an act of vandalism, therefore it was an offensive labelling to call my edit vandalism. Awat 20:17, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although it's not vandalism, it's still disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point. Please don't do it again. Khoi khoi 20:22, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To prove what point? Awat 20:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When you reverted here, you added "Turkic-speaking" to the Azeris page. Khoi khoi 20:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So what's wrong with that? Kurds are an Iranic-speaking people and Azerbaijani Turks are a Turkic people. I don't get it. Awat 20:33, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look: all I'm asking is that when you have a point, please say it on the talk page—rather than disrupting other articles. Khoi khoi 20:34, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, You have a valid point but actually I was in no way going to disrupt any article. This is not my intention. Please assume good faith. Awat 20:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem—I'm just in a bad mood today. :-) Khoi khoi 20:44, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Awat! Which contribution of yours are you talking about? All the best. Zkaradag

Hi, Zkardag, the one that I added the word Turkic-speaking to the article Azerbaijanis. But apparently there was already a consensus that this term should be excluded and I was unaware. Awat 20:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I got the point. Saying ethnic group is better than saying Turkic speaking people. Zkaradag 21:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sebaret be Nîştimanekeman

Zor supas bo lêkdanaweket. Bîr û boçûnî minîş her wek toye, ke nîştimanekeman le jêr destî biyanî daye, belam debê eweş le bîr nekeyn ke lêre da, debê nûsrawekan û wutarekan le gel rastî siyasî ewroy cîhan da biguncê, wata ew rastiyey ke çuwar wulatî dirawsê gemaroyan dawîn û her kameyan beşêk le kurdistan yan xistote jêr desellatî xoyan. Êsta sinûrêkî nawneteweyî le nêwan başûr û rojhelat da heye, we be hoy ewe, beşî rojhellat le rûwangey nawneteweyî yewe wekû beşêk le Êran densarê. Em rastiyaneş debê le wutarekan da danî pêda binrê, le ber ewey ke "encyclopaedia" debê rastî cîhanî derewe qebûl bikat. Bo nawî wutar, debê ew nawe bekar bihênrê ke zortir le medyakan û serçawekan da amajey pê dekirê. Be ray min, "Iranian Kurdisan" wuşeyekî nasrawe ke layen zorbey layene siyasî û zanistiyekanewe kelkî lê werdegîrî.Heja Helweda 23:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Thanks for the info. on Corduene cities, and its people's mastery in building, I found the passage in Strabo' Geography. Pir Sipas.Heja Helweda 01:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Corduene

Hi,

Please notice that the title of the article is Corduene (a Latin word), and Corduene for most of its history was part of the Roman Empire. Beit Kardu is much more ancient than Corduene, as it was mentioned by the Assyrian Kings. If you have enough material, then it may be good idea to start a seperate article on Beit Kardu. It's better to confine the present article to just Roman Corduene, since most of the sources are from that period and about the campaigns of Romans against the Parthians(see the external links). It is clear that Cordueni were allied with the Romans against the Persians.Heja Helweda 05:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. About the new article, I suggest Bet Qardu(or better transliterations). It is better to stick with the original semitic reference. Qutium does not seems to be a primary name, since it sounds more like a Greek/Roman pronounciation, although that can also be included inside the article. I suggest to include all the semitic references of Sumerians, Babylonians and Assyrians into that article. It seems that you are better in dealing with images since this copy right issue seems quite complicated to me. However if I find better images/maps I 'll let you know. Her bimînî di xêr û xweşiyê de.Heja Helweda 04:59, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Kurds

I would be happy if you could Join the Kurdish WikiProject. Regards. --D.Kurdistani 06:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Kurdistan

Hi, the WikiProject for Kurdish related topics has been started and there is still an ongoing discussion about renaming it. You added your name to the list of interested Wikipedian’s on the proposal page, if you still are interested I would like you to join in on the discussion, and please feel free to ask questions or post your opinions on the talk page. Here is the link to the main project page.WikiProject Kurdistan --D.Kurdistani 19:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Armenia Kurdistan Locator.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Armenia Kurdistan Locator.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cat ^chi? 11:24, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sagarthians

I see you added last year the following line in Ancient Iranian peoples: "Sagarthians (whose name survives in the name of the Zagros Mountains)." [1]. I put there a "citation needed" tag because I can't find any reference about this ethimology. Could you please add yours? Regards, Amizzoni 23:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]