Jump to content

User talk:Avrobe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avrobe (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, my account was blocked just one day after its creation, I am a regular user, I only four editions on page Presidential Candidate Roque De La Fuente changing his profile picture for my lack of knowledge about copyright did not know the reason of why I reversed the change, to the point where I believed they were committing vandalism to my edition, but was not, was blocked and charged with Judy P. sock puppet of Bush, there must be a way I could show that only I do my job as editor by updating the page of this Mr. Roque De La Fuente., also I mention that I am the owner of the 2 avrobe account and Mickey09 which have been blocked by editing the page from my office PC, personal pc and my desktop pc home. I can provide any information they ask me to unlock my computer IP and to continue doing my work freely always comply with the policies imposed by wikipedia. Thank you rav 18:26, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Stop creating new accounts, please. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 18:39, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avrobe (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

But what kind of government are you, I apologize and tell them I'm not a puppet of another person, rather than looking for a way to verify my identity only block my computers and you say you do not create more accounts, I just created the account avrobe for my personal use, Mickey109 account I administer is an account created to update the profile and information from Roque de la Fuente, give me an answer or a more convincing solution because I think a lack of respect not take into account my word, do not understand how they have the power to block the IP of a team and have no way to verify the usuariorav 18:56, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Creating a new account to circumvent the block on a previous account is considered block evasion and will see the new account blocked, too, just as happened to this one. Instead of creating new accounts, you should contest the block on your original account. If editing Wikipedia is your job, you will need to disclose that to comply with the Terms of Use, by the way. Huon (talk) 19:21, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avrobe (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What are the steps to unlock my PC and to use wikipedia. It is not possible that you accuse me of something I have not done just because someone else associated with me, I need your help to solve this problem.rav 02:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See below. Talk page access revoked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your only hope of ever being unblocked is at Wikipedia:Standard offer. Exact instructions are as follows:
  • Log out and stay off of the site for at least six months. Do NOT create any more accounts, do not do anything on the site.
  • Log in to your original account (the first one you made)
  • Use the unblock request template on your first and original account. In your unblock request, promise to never sockpuppet again, and promise to stay away from the Rocky De La Fuente article for another year.
  • Do not edit Rocky De La Fuente or any page related to it, but do good work on other articles. Do not get into any more trouble. Learn how to use the site and show us that you have learned how to cooperate and edit productively.
  • After working on other parts of the site for a year, suggest changes at Talk:Rocky De La Fuente instead of making the changes yourself. Wait until someone else affirms that your suggested idea is a good one before trying to edit that article.
Just saying "Ok" to all of this will not get you unblocked, but arguing about it will definitely keep you blocked. This is your only hope. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:58, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I understand everything you tell me, can you now clarify why not let update the information Roque De La Fuente when edits that have been made are taken from a legal reference source, as http://www.abcfoxmontana.com/ and other media divulge information only valid.