Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! -- Perfecto 22:22, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Reversions

Stop making arbitrary reversions to the article. I am not making "drive by" edits; actually, I am one of Wikipedia's earliest and most active users. The source of the information I have added is The Christian Science Monitor, a very respected Western publication. Unless you have a source stating that the Monitor article is incorrect, please stop removing referenced material from the article. 172 | Talk 22:10, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First off, you're doing a lot more than posting a "bit" of material from The Christian Science Monitor. You've deleted large amounts of objective material and made unsupported changes. I just realized you were involved with earlier arguments over this article in the discussion. I'd recommend you take this matter up again in the discussions and defend your actions, including the deletions, and seek consensus. You've not done that. As such, I'll revert your edits which appear partisan and unsupported. Avraamrii 01:04, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have things upside down. Your edits appear partisan and unsupported, not mine. The material I removed was unsupported by references. The material that you removed was supported by a citation. 172 | Talk 02:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments about the Gallup poll have been re-inserted, though the poll appears nowhere in the Gallop organization's web site. It may be subject to further modification/deletion if it can't be found. Your other edits were reverted, since you've not made an effort to defend them.

You have now been reverted twice by an administrator because your revert warring. I have already defended my edits with a citation per the policy WP:CITE. In contrast, you have been removing referenced factual information and restoring unsourced commentary. 172 | Talk 03:06, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lukashenka

Please stop deleting Polish version of Lukashenka's name. Considering the way he treats Poles in Belarus (he arrested so many without a specific reason), this version should be there too. Norum | Talk 17:40, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I just read your comment you left on my site. No problem. Norum | Talk 18:50, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to know somebody is keeping an eye out for that page. Valentinian ^(talk) 01:25, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]