User talk:Avillia

Your rollback request

Hello Avillia, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead, use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 20:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. --Dabomb87 (talk) 22:18, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh really?

What have I vandalized? Please review and correct your action. 74.13.203.118 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:30, 21 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

How am I vandalizing. I am simply adding very useful information to wikipedia. Isn't that the point of this whole site —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.201.114.46 (talk) 18:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Went ahead and modified the warnings on your page - I thought I was giving you warnings for added uncited material. Your contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated - however, as an encyclopedia, contributions need to be demonstrably based in cited fact and publications. You make two assertions in your editing - that palm oil has no correlation to heart disease, and that carbohydrates and staples of a "western diet" are the actual cause. Neither is cited - the first one actually directly contradicts the cited information that was previously on the page. Refer to WP:CITE and WP:NPOV for more information. Sorry about the misunderstanding - welcome to Wikipedia! --Avillia ^{(Avillia me!)} 18:22, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Salvador Allende didn't commit suicide. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.196.174.132 (talk) 18:38, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Firebuild

Don't issue warnings to him. We reckon he's just a newbie that needs some help.--The Master of Mayhem 22:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Avilia, please see WP:Vandalism. I don't see how you would think that these edits were "a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia"--it is simply not possible. Please be more careful in the future. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:55, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see that he was the primary contributor to the page - all I saw was refblanking without an edit summary by a user who was created today - suspicious behavior when you're RC patrolling, I'm sure you can agree. My apologies - I've removed the warning from his page. --Avillia ^{(Avillia me!)} 23:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

stacy keibler

hi,

you deleted my revisions to stacy keibler's page. I am a huge fan of hers and noticed that there was a ton of wrong information on her page so i tried to correct it. i used this article: http://murphandcassidypr.com/ttvinterview.html for citations which is listed on her publicist's website so I'm not sure why everyone keeps undoing my edits.

She says that she doesn't have a middle name but on the wiki it keeps putting "Ann-Marie". Can you please help me figure out what I can do to stop people from overwriting my changes?

THANK YOU! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redtapshoes (talk • contribs) 21:05, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Glad to see you're back!

WT79 ^{(speak to me | editing patterns | what I been doing)} 20:51, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) --Avillia ^{(Avillia me!)} 02:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]