User talk:Aviation999

Hi Aviation999! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

18:30, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 649pardeep (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have removed Reference columns from Airports destinations list without citing any reason again. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 649pardeep (talk) 02:36, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@649pardeep: Where does it say reference columns are requirement? It DOESN'T. Aviation999 (talk) 13:28, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviation999: refs column makes compulsion for references for every destination without 3rd column 2nd column looks messy . I think there is no issue with 3rd column if , you can cite the reason, I will consider.649pardeep (talk) 14:16, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@649pardeep: Go look at WT:AIRPORTS, there's a few reason for you. Aviation999 (talk) 15:06, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

TonyBallioni (talk) 01:28, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]