User talk:Avhahn

Welcome...

Hello, Avhahn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Mario1987 17:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zscheiplitz

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Zscheiplitz, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://zscheiplitz.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Zscheiplitz

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Zscheiplitz, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://zscheiplitz.com, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Zscheiplitz and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Zscheiplitz, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Zscheiplitz with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Zscheiplitz. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Zscheiplitz saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:42, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Weissenburg, Zscheiplitz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Weissenburg, Zscheiplitz, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://zscheiplitz.com/offers/tours/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:57, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Avhahn. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Weissenburg, Zscheiplitz, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:58, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Your addition to Weissenburg, Zscheiplitz has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Do this again and you'll be blocked from editing. Randykitty (talk) 11:34, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion

Please stop trying to promote your business here – Wikipedia does not tolerate promotion of any kind, and our Terms of Use do not permit anyone with a financial interest in the topic to edit without disclosure. If I see one more attempt to promote Zscheiplitz, its castle/wine/abbey, or the family that owns it, I will ask for you to be blocked from editing as a promotion-only account. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:15, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Avhahn - I am promoting a world-class monument of immense cultural importance. The text placed was very balanced and objective. Please stop bulling me and let the wiki community to decide. Shame on you!

August 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:34, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avhahn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Avhahn (talk) 14:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your explanation below seems to be justifying leaving you blocked indefinitely for violating WP:COI and WP:PROMO. If you wish to be unblocked, you'll need to convince us that you've read and understood those policies, and won't engage in any further promotion. Yamla (talk) 14:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My article dedicated to the world-class historical monument. I promote and encourage people to visit it, as well as many other historical places across Germany. Also, the article published in 2015 was severely edited and much inofrmation removed. The 'indefinite block' is unjust and unfair.

"I promote and encourage people to visit it"... "it" being a property owned by the von Hahn family? As you have been told, you are not allowed to use Wikipedia to promote private interests. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avhahn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I stated the fact, not 'promote' my family in any ways. There are plenty of articles in WIKI stating that the castle so-and-so belongs to a particular family - what si wrong with it?

Further, the reason to delete the article in the first place was copyright violation, not 'promotion. It only appeared after all copyright issues were solved. I was not given time to rewrite the text or adjust it according to the requirements, although my second version published today was much shorter then the original text published earlier this week.

In general, there seems to be no tolerance or desire to clarify the issue before blocking and deleting. The only solution, it seems, is to prosecute and humiliate.

Thank you!

Decline reason:

The overwhelming majority of your edits since creating your account appear to have been to promote the Von Hahn family. Any unblock would be conditional on you agreeing to stop promoting your family's interests here. Since that still appears to be your only purpose, this appeal is declined. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:17, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But you openly stated that you were promoting it. Twice. And your text was blatantly promotional - eg "Carried out by the Hahn family without any financial or material assistance from the state or the local community the restoration of the Kloster Zscheiplitz is a challenging project aimed at creating a viable and dynamic community of heritage enthusiasts from around the world". If that's not promoting your family's interests and evidence of a clear conflict of interest, then I don't know what is. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First of all please explain, how the statement regarding the restoration work without 'any financial or material assistance from the state or the local community' promoted my family? It is a fact, not a speculation.

Secondly, the text in question was removed by myself after the notification. It was omitted in my latest publication on Weissenburg. Please review your records.