User talk:AveryG

Hello, AveryG, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message. Sorry, I think i posted on the wong page. Thasnk you!AveryG 02:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

You can click on the last link to get to my talk page. --Umalee 21:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. If you have any particular questions you want to ask, please do so! --Umalee 18:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How to Cite Sources in an article

Avery,

Please read:

Wikipedia:Citing sources and also Wikipedia:Citing sources/example style

You need to work on how you add information to Wikipedia.

I think you are doing great, but you have to figure out what an encyclopedia is, and what it is not. Step back and contimplate this for a while.

1) Don't "own" these articles. Contribute and don't get attached to them. You'll be happier.

2) If you want to contribute more editorial prose style, this is NOT the place.

3) In an encyclopedia we do not say things like:

The Nile is a lovely river in Africa.

We say:

The Nile is a river in Africa.

You can say:

"A less pleasant commemoration of her was the naming of the slave ship."

This is editorial prose.

While "less pleasant" maybe 100% true, is it really encyclopedic? Go to the library and look at an encyclopedia, it is SHORT, CONCISE, and does not put in such POV material.

You may write information that is 100% accurate, and is good material, but does not belong here, in an encyclopedia.

Encyclopedias, are BLACK and WHITE (for the most part). It is not Live Planet, or something close to that.

A lot of people mis-understand what is needed here, including myself. I have to continuely check myself from editorializing and interjecting my own thoughts into my contributions, and still things seem to slip through. But, I do better if I give up "ownership" of the article, I don't take it to heart, don't take it personally. If I can stay back and remain objective, I seem to do a lot better at keeping "waffle words" out.

SEE: Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles (This is a good one!)

I know that I am a better encyclopedia editor now, than I was when I first started here, in May of 2004. But I know that I can still improve even more than what I have done so far. The amount of information that I DON'T know keeps growing faster than the list of what I DO know.

Thanks, keep up the good work, improve, but keep it up.

IP4240207xx 18:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crandall Canyon Mine

Once you have read how to cite a source, go back and fix the one you added to the article Crandall Canyon Mine today.

1) Who wrote it? What person?

2) What is the title of the source?

3) Where was it published?

4) When was it published?

5) How do you find the source? (You can include the webpage with the title.)

6) When did you retrieve the information?

The best way to add something, lets say you want to add one sentence, like you did, is to find more sources to back up the first one that you found. The MORE you can find the better.

IP4240207xx 18:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John David R. Atchison

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of John David R. Atchison, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://en.wasalive.com/en/federal+prosecutor. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 02:44, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]