User talk:AvatarEight

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Omniverse theory.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 08:09, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Omniverse theory, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chzz ► 14:55, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Omniverse theory for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omniverse theory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omniverse theory until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. IRWolfie- (talk) 19:12, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion to previous version

The author, Dr. Charles Tandy, has directed me to revert this page to a previous version, which was accepted by Chazz for publication here. It has subsequently been edited and stripped of content so as to reduce its value so now it's being considered for deletion. We hope that future edits, if any, are less destructive.

In your edit here, you write that you are reverting "his" page at Dr. Tandy's request. You may wish to read WP:NOTYOURS; once published here, neither you nor Dr. Tandy is the owner of the article.Vulcan's Forge (talk) 02:41, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]