User talk:AvantGardeAClue

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:RobertChristain22 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RobertChristain22. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 09:12, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AvantGardeAClue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I am not a sock puppet, and I never abused or broke any rules. One of my edits on the unreleased Beatles song Carnival of Light was reverted because people thought it was unnecessary, but I stopped the third time I was reverted. I made a second account for my friend to log into so he could also edit, but neither him or I broke rules on that account. If I was a sock puppet, why would I attach my email to the sock puppet account? I submitted the Wheat Album draft because I thought it was informative. I didn't know that the creator was doing vandalism.AvantGardeAClue (talk) 15:40, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please see WP:MEAT. Yamla (talk) 17:09, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AvantGardeAClue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not make an account for my friend to help me prove any points. If you are saying that I made the account for him to help me in an edit war on the Beatles Carnival of Light, you have the wrong idea. If you look in the edit history of that article, you can see that only I edited on the article. If you look into the edit history of my friend's account that I created, which is Uueueueu, you can see that we haven't edited on the same page before. AvantGardeAClue (talk) 17:16, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's not why you made an account for your friend or what you did or didn't do with it that concerns us. It's that you did it in the first place. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:29, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.