User talk:Avaay

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avaay (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just want to help wiki and I have edited for a while helping with many articles but I have a block now for no reason?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to admins: Please see also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Josh.172, thanks! Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 14:06, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have only followed rules!! This is not ethical to block me, I find this offending.

Incorrect. It is unethical for you to violate WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 14:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not blank declines for currently-active blocks. This is not permitted. --Yamla (talk) 14:18, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TYPE MESSEGE ONLY ON MY TALK PAGE

GNG

If you have evidence for Mr Tesfaye passing WP:GNG, please supply it at the AfD. Thanks, Struway2 (talk) 12:12, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Struway2, will you change your answer then? It's super obvious that he is suited for a note via GNG... Avaay (talk)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Avaay (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Avaay (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Not provided

Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: You are directly blocked. Apply at your primary account. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:20, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avaay (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please I asking for a second chance.

Decline reason:

Apply at you primary account. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.