User talk:Autoterm

The fair use rationale was actually there, however, I located and inserted the relevant template and presented that information in a more structured fashion.Autoterm 19:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The images I removed from the article on Translation did not meet the criteria for inclusion; that is, they neither explained or illustrated the topic of the article, nor did they illustrate some visual aspect of it. You have said several times that you thought they looked nice, and their absence makes the article boring, but as this is an encyclopedia and not a personal webpage I am afraid those arguments aren't relevant here. Naturezak (talk) 19:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Global reach muegge.cc.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Global reach muegge.cc.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:40, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Hofmann Approximately.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hofmann Approximately.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:43, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hofmann Anthology.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hofmann Anthology.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]