User talk:Autoctono~enwiki

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Autoctono. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Autoctono~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

22:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

10:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Fluorochomasia.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Fluorochomasia.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:45, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fluorochromasia

The article Fluorochromasia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While this is almost certainly a valid scientific topic, the condition of this article illustrates an article that needs to be blown up and started over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Saving

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I was writing a new article in Wizard and lost everything. How can I save my writings?

My personal recommendation: Add "importScript('User:Gryllida/js/addInstantSaveToCodeEditor.js');" to meta:Special:MyPage/global.js. Then your edit box will have 'Instant Save' button which saves your content immediately and allows you to continue editing it. This is ok if the content is not in the main namespace; saving incomplete work in main namespace may result in its quick removal (depending on how incomplete it is).
Another option is to write the article in a word processor program which auto-saves the content to a file on your personal computer. Once you have finished, copy it to Wikipedia. Gryllida (talk) 01:45, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

editing newly created sandbox2

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I created a new sandbox2. but there is NO button to see it in Wikipedia format.

Please help me with...

Autoctono~enwiki (talk) 22:25, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All of the contributions you make to Wikipedia can be viewed at Special:Contributions/Autoctono~enwiki (or by clicking Contributions at the top of the page). The particular sandbox you're looking for can be found at User:Autoctono~enwiki/sandbox2. Brad v 22:43, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Boris Rotman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Boris Rotman, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Brad v 01:31, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fluorochromasia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fluorochromasia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluorochromasia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boris Rotman (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Catrìona was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boris Rotman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Boris Rotman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Catrìona (talk) 22:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Autoctono~enwiki! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Catrìona (talk) 22:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Boris Rotman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Boris Rotman. Thanks! Catrìona (talk) 22:33, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Autoctono~enwiki! You created a thread called Footnotes at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boris Rotman has been accepted

Boris Rotman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 04:58, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with the need for verification. What document do I need to submit?

Autoctono~enwiki 00:01, 21 October 2018 (UTC) Autoctono~enwiki 00:01, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Usually, when Wikipedians talk about verification, they are referring to the need to supply a reliable source for a fact stated in an article. Secondary sources are preferred. There is no document to submit, you simply have to prepare a citation to the source that can be included in the article. You seem to be too experienced for me to suggest referencing for beginners, but that is not a bad place to start. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:35, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Further conversation about the Boris Rotman article, specifically, should occur at Talk:Boris Rotman. I've started a section there about the problems with missing citations. Has anyone asked if you had a connection with Rotman? — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:50, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Marten Scheffer, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 00:06, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Schematic view of fluorochromasia molecular mechanism.pdf

The file File:Schematic view of fluorochromasia molecular mechanism.pdf has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file that is redundant to File:Schematic diagram of fluorochromasia molecular mechanism.pdf, which is superior because it shows the entire title, while part of the title of this one is cut off.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm _Talk 15:21, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]