User talk:Authoritty

Nomination of Godspower Oparaugo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Godspower Oparaugo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godspower Oparaugo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 20:40, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to verify the article more to ascertain why it should not be deleted. I am only suggesting and do hope my suggestions will reach your considerations. Authoritty (talk) 20:48, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Godspower Oparaugo also have articles on some websites such as http//modernghana.com. He is a founder of an NGO known as Initiative for African Citizens which was officially registered with Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), Nigeria. He worth having a Wikipedia page. Kindly see reasons with me.

Speedy deletion nomination of Godspower Oparaugo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Godspower Oparaugo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 21:41, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Godspower Oparaugo also have articles on some websites such as http//modernghana.com. He is a founder of an NGO known as Initiative for African Citizens which was officially registered with Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), Nigeria. He worth having a Wikipedia page. Kindly see reasons with me.

January 2020

Hello Authoritty. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Godspower Oparaugo, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Authoritty. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Authoritty|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. kingboyk (talk) 00:36, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your concern on this topic, but I must state in good faith that I am being paid or working for financial benefit to edit this article. I am editing this article because I know Godspower Oparaugo in good number of years and his interest to make changes in his locality, as a youth activist and author. I believe giving him a page/article on Wikipedia is something that he would desire, and to promote his little but valued work for humanity. Authoritty (talk) 08:09, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Godspower Oparaugo also have articles on some websites such as http//modernghana.com. He is a founder of an NGO known as Initiative for African Citizens which was officially registered with Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), Nigeria. He worth having a Wikipedia page. Kindly see reasons with me.

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Authoritty, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Deb (talk) 17:43, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that it has been compromised. If your account is locked, please contact ca

wikimedia.org. Otherwise, if you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then add this below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}}.GeneralNotability (talk) 13:37, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]