User talk:Austin Tsar444

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Austin Tsar444

A tag has been placed on Austin Tsar444 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Happysailor ^(Talk) 20:34, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Historic Houses in South Carolina

A tag has been placed on Historic Houses in South Carolina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 02:05, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Historic Houses in Maryland

A tag has been placed on Historic Houses in Maryland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Basket of Puppies 03:14, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

WikiProject Kentucky		Welcome to our project!
		Thank you for joining WikiProject Kentucky. Please take a few moments and look over our project page and the various project departments. We encourage every member to find their niche and work on the parts of the project they most enjoy. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask on our project talk page. Again, welcome!

Noticed on your user page that you are still learning the ropes. If you need any help, drop me a line on my talk page. User:Willking1979 is also a cool guy and a good resource. Acdixon ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 14:44, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Barack Obama, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tad Lincoln (talk) 21:13, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Barack Obama. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tad Lincoln (talk) 21:45, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:UNDUE: "Wikipedia should not present a dispute as if a view held by a small minority deserved as much attention overall as the majority view." NawlinWiki (talk) 21:46, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Perry Park, Kentucky, you will be blocked from editing. In addition, your use of multiple sockpuppet accounts in order to edit war will get you blocked from editing. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 01:53, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Perry Park, Kentucky. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 06:14, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Austin Tsar444 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 12:59, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for 1 Week for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Perry Park, Kentucky. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

IronGargoyle (talk) 19:29, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

–Signalhead ^< T > 21:09, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]