User talk:Austin131

About your deletion of Advanced Rocket Research Center

Hello Austin131, I have got your notification and revised the page Advanced Rocket Research Center now. I am a new editor in Wikipedia. It is excited to learn the rule of editing. However, I have a question. That is, for revising the page of Advanced Rocket Research Center, will it still be deleted soon?

Finally, thank you for your correction. Willy81234 (talk) 09:24, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Willy81234:, Yes! It was deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs) and the reasons for its deletion was included in the page. If your need any help, you may leave a message on my talk page Happy editing! Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 04:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Nigerian human right activists

Am aware that you tagged the above article as orphan even when the page was linked to other articles. I want do let you know that I de-orphaned the page per WP:O. An article is orphaned if no other articles link to it. It is recommended to only place the {{Orphan}} tag if the article has zero incoming links from other articles. Please do not tag articles if you are not familiar with policies. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 04:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikicology: It is my understanding that articles "that cannot be reached via a series of links from the Main Page" and "a group of articles that link to each other, but have few or no links to them from other Wikipedia articles" are classified as an orphan. The only links to the page were userpages, a notice board, and Festus Keyamo. Festus Keyamo meets the same aforementioned criteria, as it links to no main Wikipedia article other than List of Nigerian human rights activists. Austin131 (talk) 09:49, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is recommended to only place the {{Orphan}} tag if the article has zero incoming links from other articles. Ensure to follow that recommendation in the future. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 10:51, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About you comment on Young Chef Olympiad Article.

Hi,

Thank you for pointing out the problems of bare URLs. I am new hence learning at every step. I have added full citation. Can you remove the tags? Also can you advice me about the best way to archive the URLs to prevent rot?

Thanks you, Gaurabwiki (talk) 05:20, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have added archived URLs. Thank you. Gaurabwiki (talk) 06:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Gaurabwiki:, Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Always use this tool to fix the bare references. In case you need any help or question, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Cheers! Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 06:36, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Austin131,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]