User talk:Austen Redman

Hyperlocal Question

Hey Austen, I responded to your question and posed some more on the Local News Discussion page. Check it out. If you want to leave me a message you can do so on my user talk page. --Ill seletorre 21:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

new to Wikipedia

It's not that long since I registered with Wikipedia myself. You look to doing fine. I've found by clicking on "edit this page", but without actually editing/saving, I get some ideas how to edit articles from other users page contributions. Good luck with your articles. Cayden 23:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since nobody else has, Welcome!

Hello, Austen Redman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Concrete Cowboy 18:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Concrete Cowboy! I shall study the finer points of editing. AFCR 18:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turton and environs

Ooh, it's about time someone took the Turton and Edgeworth and so on pages in hand. Lovely to see one for Chapeltown too. Are you in the area? I wonder whether the stocks are still over the road from St Anne's? Wikipedia needs a picture of stocks :) Anyway, nice work! Telsa (talk) 23:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was fast work. I hope you didn't go to any trouble. Excellent photo, too. In fact, I am seriously tempted to suggest moving the photo to the top of the stocks article. Telsa (talk) 17:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest?

I'd like to write an article on the architect Francis Johnson. I have previously written about him here: http://www.grandtradition.net/?q=hilborough-house-norfolk

My problems are:

There is already a page for Francis Johnson (architect) - but this seems to be the same person as Francis Johnston (architect).
I work for Francis Johnson & Partners, the firm he founded.

I never actually met the man and I would not be including a link to the firms website - as we don't have one at the moment. I was intending to site a biography published in 2001 and some newspaper articles. I can also include references to a less flattering article by Jonathan Glancy and not list any work by the partnership after his death.

I am quite busy at the moment so it will be some time before I can write the article. Should I go ahead or am I too close to the subject?10:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

If you haven't done so, I suggest you read through WP:COI. While the guideline states you should avoid making edits where you could have a conflict of interest, it doesn't explicitly forbid it. As long as you make neutral edits (and from your description it sounds like this is your intent) I think it would be OK. Regarding the separate articles, someone has proposed a merge, which seems appropriate. If they aren't merged by the time you make your edits I suggest you be bold and do it yourself. Hoof Hearted 12:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Split

I made a first split from the List of historic buildings and architects of the United Kingdom, the prehistoric section is now located at List of prehistoric structures in Great Britain. Pax:Vobiscum 19:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:UniLincolnLogoMinerva.gif

Hello Austen Redman, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:UniLincolnLogoMinerva.gif) was found at the following location: User:Austen Redman. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:37, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:BDP Logo 2007.gif

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:BDP Logo 2007.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 15:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Belton House

Currently has an in use tag on it, as User: Danny is working there. Please be careful to avoid conflicting him. Thanks. Giano 13:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Danny 13:38, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Chetham Arms carving.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Austen Redman!
We thank you for uploading Image:Chetham Arms carving.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Edgworth Bowling Green.jpg

File:Edgworth Bowling Green.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Edgworth Bowling Green.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Edgworth Bowling Green.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 11:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be interested in joining a WikiProject devoted to Lancashire?

Hi, I have noticed that you are from Lancashire and I was wondering if you have heard of the new WikiProject group of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria. If you are interested in joining please feel free to become a paricipant and help us achive our goals. If you do join I am looking forward to your contributions. 93gregsonl2 (talk) 21:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Francis Johnson book.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Francis Johnson book.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

York meetup

Hi Austen Redman. Just to let you know there is a Wikimedia meetup being planned in York for Tuesday. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:11, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Driehaus Architecture Prize nomination for "In the News"

Hi! I nominated today's Driehaus Architecture Prize laureate Pier Carlo Bontempi to be featured on the start page of Wikipedia at "In the News". It'd be great for the whole discipline if you could support this nomination.

Please go there: Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates#Driehaus Prize and add Support or Strong Support. Thank you! All the best, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 15:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It'd be also very helpful if you could also support this request (click!), so the Driehaus Prize would be considered to be included at "In the News" every year. Thank you, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 18:02, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Entwistle Station.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Entwistle Station.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Entwistle Station.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Entwistle Station.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Entwistle Station.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Entwistle Station.jpg, which you've attributed to Robert Redman. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 10:05, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Georgian Society for East Yorkshire) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Georgian Society for East Yorkshire.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on the Georgian Society for East Yorkshire.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:36, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Francis Johnson book.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Francis Johnson book.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hog Farm _Talk 17:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]