User talk:Auspx
D&D articles for Wikipedia 0.7
[edit]Hi there! :)
As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the WikiProject D&D talk page for more details. :) BOZ (talk) 18:35, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
BLP-related article
[edit]If a reliable third-party source has not published Kopel's claims, then we cannot include a link to his work. Have a search around to see if you can find if any of his criticisms are published elsewhere, by credible sources. Dynablaster (talk) 18:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Marking edits as minor
[edit]Could you please only mark edits as minor if they are guaranteed to be uncontroversial and not large. Good uses of the minor mark are grammar and spelling errors. Marking everything minor is unhelpful since a) many people don't bother to look at minor edits and b) some people have their watchlists set up to not show minor edits. JoshuaZ (talk) 18:43, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)