Welcome!

Hello, AurangzebMarwat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Please note that Wikipedia policy is not to put military ranks in titles of articles. You can continue to add information about Sarfaraz Khan Marwat at the article of that name. DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:25, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your decision to edit Wikipedia. We are glad to have your contributions. May I suggest adding more information to Sarfaraz Khan Marwat, information that you probably know well but our readers might not. For example: What country was he born in? What army did he serve in? what battles or wars did he fight in? Thanks. DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:35, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please make further edits to Sarfaraz Khan Marwat only. Thank you. DJ Clayworth (talk) 16:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are lacking citations

You are not providing citations for any of the articles created by you so far. This will ultimately result in Deletion of the Article. Please try to find references or clean-up the Article so it should be re-build with references and citations. Regards --LineofWisdom (talk) 17:04, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lt.Col Sarfaraz Khan Marwat

A tag has been placed on Lt.Col Sarfaraz Khan Marwat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WWGB (talk) 11:00, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lt.Col Sarfaraz Khan Marwat

A tag has been placed on Lt.Col Sarfaraz Khan Marwat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Favonian (talk) 11:53, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Lt.Col Sarfaraz Khan Marwat. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 11:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Lt.Col Sarfaraz Khan Marwat

Hi there AurangzebMarwat! I saw that you added a {{hangon}} tag to a page which you created, Lt.Col Sarfaraz Khan Marwat. This is good, but in the process you removed the tag requesting deletion under CSD A7. Even though there is a hangon on the page, the deletion template should remain there. But don't worry, this doesn't mean that the page is going to get deleted. Make sure you edit the talk page of the page nominated for deletion, located at Talk:Lt.Col Sarfaraz Khan Marwat, administrators will look at your reason why the page should remain before they decide what to do. Thanks - SDPatrolBot (talk) 11:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with Lt.Col Sarfaraz Khan Marwat, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Favonian (talk) 12:38, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Cirt (talk) 13:12, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 06:30, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Marwats tree.PNG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Marwats tree.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Zoo Fari 01:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Lt.Col SarfaraZ Khan.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Lt.Col SarfaraZ Khan.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 22:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, AurangzebMarwat. You have new messages at A little insignificant's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Alaka za hum Marwat yam

I am from Mullazai, I am Masood Jan, Lt. Col Sarfaraz is my grand father. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.99.183.116 (talk) 17:26, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Masood Jan son of???....i dont know such masood jan,,,please would you tell me more brother? AurangzebMarwat (talk)

Son on Dil Jan

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mullazai. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 17:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Masood Jan this is my work..i want your kind help.am his grandson ..u mighjt know me...thanks AurangzebMarwat (talk)

No idea who Masood Jan is but no one owns or controls an article so it's not "your work". See WP:OWN. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 17:51, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mullazai

In response to your request I have come to assist with the article Mullazai. However it seems that you are doing some bad editing yourself. You are repeatedly adding external links to an internet map, when it is not clear that the map is helpful. Please stop repeatedly editing the article and instead edit the talk page to explain what you are trying to do any why. DJ Clayworth (talk) 17:44, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The page is proected

Alaka page khome protect kro. Us geza kha. Bya cherta ma sera chair unake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.99.183.116 (talk) 17:56, 30 October 2009 (UTC) chayr ta sara cha kray da???....ta bal tribe khabaro k goaty wahay,,,, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newsfuse (talk • contribs) 18:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Newsfuse (talk) alaka ta akhapl peshawar k editing kawa... southern distircs k sta sa kar da dil jan??? —Preceding undated comment added 18:07, 30 October 2009 (UTC).

Oh, no.

Per this edit, looks like Newsfuse is your sockpuppet. This is blockable offense. A little insignificant ^{Bloated on candy} 20:47, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked Newsfuse, would you like to confirm that is your sockpuppet? Whether you admit it or not, expect to be under more scrutiny for not only having a sockpuppet but using it for nefarious purposes ("Creating an illusion of support", "Contributing to the same page with multiple accounts", "Posing as a neutral commentator", etc from WP:SOCK). tedder (talk) 21:27, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(the following, from AurangzebMarwat, is pasted from my talk page. Bringing here to centralize discussion, especially because user is blocked. tedder (talk) 00:25, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Newsfuse is not my puppet,here in pak ptcl broad band is largly used,using dynamic ip,means that could be assignet to another,nuthing clear from user: little insignificant .its up to u .u block it or un-block that poor :P ..thanks AurangzebMarwat (talk) 22:09, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tan | 39 23:29, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AurangzebMarwat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my account is blocked for no reason,its totally un-just.There is no single evidence for reason of block.Furthermore,my contributions to wikipedia should not be under-estimated.My work specially on Mullazai is not less than master-piece,its becasue of my tirey and time consumed work.So its requested,please look into this matter and let me work once again.Thanks

Decline reason:

Failure to address reason for block. Daniel Case (talk) 04:36, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AurangzebMarwat (talk)