User talk:Augustofagioli

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Neighborhood do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

noteurbane.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://www.noteurbane.com

✤ JonHarder ^talk 22:33, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Augustofagioli (talk) 13:56, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure JonHarder! Thanks for your attention to link contribution. I agree with you my link contribution to wikipedia falls into COI, which confirm your action (link removal) could be correct. Also true is Reliable sources (read: "Self-published sources (online and paper)"). I'm pretty confident http://noteurbane.com is an helpful source to readers interested in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neighbourhood. I'm truly interested in your feedback. Thank you.

Wikipedia articles are not intended as a directory of useful resources. They would completely overwhelm an article such as Neighbourhood. ✤ JonHarder ^talk 18:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Augustofagioli (talk) 15:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong respect to your efforts on Wikipedia, where I see you're very proficient.

Anyway, your statement ...are not intended as a directory of useful resources... is not confirmed by the link you yourself provide. Ou contraire, your link says: "There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to an article..." This is also confirmed by so many wiki pages linking to external pertinent website [without searching too long, I've found this example for you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_civil_parishes_in_Cumbria ]

Since you were not able to produce a incontestable reason for you to remove the http://noteurbane.com link I added to the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neighbourhood I ask you to restore my action, untill you produce a proper 3rd part advice

I decline to restore the link. If you would like another opinion, consider bringing this to WP:EL/N. ✤ JonHarder ^talk 22:37, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mr JonHarder,

You made an action which I'm claiming as wrong.
For this, You've been asked to produce a incontestable element to prove your action as correct, which You have not been able to.
This makes your action as lawless.
Following community common sense, I can't see a good reason you can decline to go and find for someone/something to discuss with your "removal" action.
Augustofagioli (talk) 22:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cloned articles

Weird:

all those articles share same text

Babine Gornje
Pjenovac
Berkovina
Malo Polje (Han Pijesak)
Mrkalji (Han Pijesak)
Džimrije
Kraljevo Polje
Rijeke
Jelovci (Han Pijesak)
Plane (Han Pijesak) Stoborani
Podžeplje

Going and contact authors Augustofagioli (talk) 19:16, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I responded on my talk page, but if you look at the "history" for the article, you can find the original author. I agree that all the articles are nearly the same, but have different coordinates, so I am assuming are different places in the same political subdivision. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:25, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Augustofagioli/Santa Savinilla Catacombs

Hello, Augustofagioli. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Santa Savinilla Catacombs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Santa Savinilla Catacombs

Hello, Augustofagioli. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Santa Savinilla Catacombs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 22:41, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]