User talk:Krunal at Au Financiers

This is Krunal at Au Financiers's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Au Financiers (India) Limited (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also reads like an advertisement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Au Financiers (India) Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:15, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Aufin1996, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:15, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ian.thomson (talk) 10:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Krunal at Au Financiers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #15968 was submitted on Jun 15, 2016 10:09:01. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Krunal at Au Financiers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Krunal_DigitalMarketing (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

was not aware about user name policy

Decline reason:

You have addressed only the username issue, not the more important issue of the nature of your editing. You need to address both issues in order to be unblocked. You are not going to be unblocked in order to let you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising or marketing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:39, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd initially declined this since I thought that your username was the name of a company (ie, "Krunal Digital Marketing"), however a second glance shows that you're likely posting your first name and then the name of the company. If this is the case it's better to phrase it like "Krunal at Digital Marketing" so that there's no ambiguity.

Offhand I don't have any huge problem with unblocking you. You are a marketing person and the AfC draft was promotional, however the fact that you tried making this at AfC instead of going directly live and you sought out advice at least twice does show that you were trying to edit within guidelines. You just need to be more careful with editing, something that can be difficult when you're more used to writing marketing prose, as most marketers are so used to writing promotionally that they don't pick up on what is promotional or might have issues.

An example of the promotional content would be the use of "we" and "I". Wikipedia articles are written about the topic and not by them, so the article should be written in the third person. (ie, "Pepsi Cola is an American soda company" rather than "We are an American soda company") You should also avoid marketing WP:BUZZWORDS like "inspired", "vision of", and "prestigious". Going into too much detail about something seen as relatively minor on Wikipedia can also be promotional, so try to see if something can be summed up in 2-4 sentences rather than 2-4 paragraphs. Of course not everything should be summed up so briefly, but most things can be on here since this is supposed to be an overview rather than an exhaustive report. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Au Financiers (India) Limited

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Au Financiers (India) Limited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:18, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Krunal at Au Financiers. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:29, 27 June 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

About Username & Article drafted about Au Financiers

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Krunal at Au Financiers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Krunal at Au Financiers (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I was not aware about user name policy as well as the content writing policy of the Wikipedia, now onward i will be careful writing about the company. I will talk about the company, will follow the rules of Wikipedia

Decline reason:

No response to the below questions after 48 hours. Nick-D (talk) 08:49, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've renamed your account. Another admin will review your unblock request shortly. PhilKnight (talk) 00:43, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a few key questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the three important principles above. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]