User talk:Audreyann72/sandbox
Peer ReviewJoseph Henk
The lead paragraph for this article offers a clear definition, examples, and insight, on Administrative Discretion. The paragraph also contains history of usage when it comes to Administrative Discretion.
The Key Points of the Article are History, and Examples of Administrative Discretion coupled with the modern day illustration of how its used and regarded.
The article has clear topics followed by concise evidence, sources, and explanation. The article also uses varying perspectives to further explain exactly how Administrative Discretion is used and how people see it in a ethical standpoint.
Minimal punctuation and grammar mistakes. Overall, very well written with clear sentences.
The article remains with a neutral tone throughout and contains minimal bias or opinionated language. Sources are accurate and scholarly
Informative illustrations are also used to enhance information and main topics
Special Feedback: the article is very organized and very well written. Sounds scholarly. I do recommend adding a little more information on the ethical issue of Administrative Discretion and how it is used.
Start a discussion about improving the User:Audreyann72/sandbox page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "User:Audreyann72/sandbox" page.
