Jump to content

User talk:Audit2clear

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, Audit2clear! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Off2riorob (talk) 23:22, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

November 2010

[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Lisa McPherson Trust. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 00:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Ursula Caberta. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Cirt (talk) 00:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Mark Bunker, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Cirt (talk) 00:43, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for evading a prior block on your previous account, User:DavidYork71. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jayron32 00:45, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Audit2clear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. Something odd has happened which has stopped the editing function here. I rechecked to confirm that I haven't made mistakes and I reread the message put to the talk tab. Can you fix this & all of us work together on a plan with some shared responsibilities and common objectives for improvement? My subject matter interests are religion reformers and the intersection of law and behaviour modification: both as they relate to Anglosphere countries.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. TNXMan 03:26, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Audit2clear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it's not necessary for preventing errors on the database. I sought to correct an error on the Dick Cheney biography that was an omission to categorise in line with information known for at least two years - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/16/cheney-admits-central-rol_n_151515.html I'm willing to have patience for other suggestions and perspectives. The action taken was extreme and precipitate. It was a breakdown avoiding desirable processes of discussion & appraisal: bullying into exclusion.

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason given for your block.  Sandstein  14:08, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Audit2clear&oldid=1072244248"