User talk:Audiobooks7

Shirley Temple

I'm not at all surprised at what you're saying. The article is a mess, and being copied straight from a fan site seems a logical explanation. So, it needs fixing, but any large scale changes should be preceded by some discussion on the article's Talk page (even just an announcement of what you're doing and why), plus, at the very least, a clear explanation in Edit summaries when you make the changes. Just make sure that other editors know what you'r doing, and why. HiLo48 (talk) 23:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will do! Glad we talked! Audiobooks7 (talk) 23:51, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's a good thing that you noticed a lot of BLP vios in that page; I'm a fan of her, but then again even a rabid fan of some actor or actress should take neutrality and objective editing into consideration when it comes to adding or changing content here in WP. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:04, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Shirley Temple, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 05:39, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean Temple's ancestry and her two brothers, the info has been reliably sourced. Please stop deleting it. This info is not "controversial", and such info appears in bios of living people (see Angelina Jolie, for example). Your insistent deletions of reliably sourced material are proving disruptive. Audiobooks7 (talk) 06:05, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All claims on biographies of living people must be sourced. If it wasn't controversial, I wouldn't have removed it, but you have seemed to have sourced it, apparently, so I'm not concerned any more. Corvus cornix_talk 07:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Little Orphan Annie

Excellent rewrite and research! Pepso2 (talk) 12:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Audiobooks7 (talk) 12:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]