User talk:Auddz/sandbox
Peer Review Article
[edit]The article is objective. There is no traces of the team being subjective at any point. I also liked that you have a lot of references which mean that you link the same information with multiple scientific papers which adds accuracy to your paper. A couple of observations I could see. There are certain sections that it is a little hard to follow what message is trying to be sent. I think this can be fix by checking the grammar. I would recommend to add titles and subtitles to your paper to add more dimension to the context that your trying to give.