User talk:Auburnknight

A tag has been placed on Rolling hills ranch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 20:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article is written in a very promotional tone, see Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. If you have any other questions feel free to leave another message. By the way it is not exactly a beneficial edit to your article to write: "Well persian girl I dont know why u say its advertising but Im only trying to explain what rolling hills ranch is and who live there. Thanks! :D". Do so on its talk page.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 20:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First of all I am not an administrator or as you you call it a "geek fan." I am a voluntary Recent Changes patroller who watches out for vandalism which you are possibly doing at the moment, see the below warnings.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 20:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Opus Dei

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --JudahBlaze 20:22, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during December 21 2006 (UTC) to Opus Dei

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 20:23, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during December 21 2006 (UTC) to Opus Dei

Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The information there is fine as it is please leave it alone.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 20:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not allow unwarrented blanking of its articles. By the way this edit does not exactly seem like trying to correct an article's information: link.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 20:45, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope that is not the case, just refrain from vandalizing Wikipedia's articles thank you. I would also suggest that you take a look at WP:CIVIL and post your responses a bit more politely please.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 20:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]