User talk:Atutahi

Please do not remove speedy delete tags from pages that you have created yourself. -- IslaySolomon 08:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry didn't have a clue what I was doing there. Atutahi 11:28, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue spamming you will be blocked from editing. Mango juice^talk 04:16, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to create an article on TangataWhenua.com, write an original article from a neutral point of view: do not repost their "about us" page on Wikipedia. Mango juice^talk 04:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, that's all you had to say in the first place rather than simply continuing to delete the article. You do have some responsibility to provide a rationale for your "speedy deletion" if not a Wikipedia requirement, than at least a moral obligation. Atutahi 08:20, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atutahi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Regarding the deleted article, there were two issues. One, (probably because it was a repost of part of their official webpage), what you were posting was blatant advertising, which is one of the criteria for speedy deletion. Two, copyvio issues: if you find text on someone's website, the normal assumption is that they own that text, and that means Wikipedia can't publish the same text (or text that's too closely derived from it). Copyvio, if detected quickly, is also a reason for speedy deletion. If you actually own the copyright on that web page, there's a whole separate batch of issues. Anyway, this welcome message has some general info about Wikipedia so if you want to continue contributing, you can learn more about the site.

Again, welcome! Mango juice^talk 18:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you thank you and again thank you :) - that's all I really wanted was an explanation, which you kindly provided. I will have a look at how other organisations are written about and attempt to reflect that style (i.e. written from an objective point of view). I definitely appreciate the processes you have in place and feel they help to add integrity to this site. Kia ora - will be putting together a more balanced piece. Now for instance, if I did own the copyright what would that mean (for future reference)? Atutahi 02:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It just seems to me that your article violates WP:SPAM, but I've asked User:Mangojuice for his opinion. Let me give you a little suggestion, though. People are always going to be much more interested in Māori language, literature, painting, carvings, dances, jewelry, fishing, hunting, politics, etc. than in a newsletter about Māori, no matter how nice the latter may be. So if you really want to help Wikipedia, I kindly suggest you write about Māoridom itself, and not about publications that write about it. Biruitorul 09:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you may have missed the point my friend. A digital newsletter, created by Maori for Maori is one step (of many) in the journey towards self-determination. Information that is sourced, researched, written and developed by Maori is more valuable, relevant and useful to the Maori community itself.

Take for instance West Papua, having news and information created and developed by West Papuans themselves is infinitely more valuable then content that is created by Indonesians FOR West Papuas. Considering also that Maori communities are only beginning to have access to the internet is another reason why organisation such as TangataWhenua.com and AoCafe for example are so important and necessary to the overall development of Maoridom in a digital age, I think that this type of attitude underestimates the value of this medium in terms of indigenous self-determination... What are your thoughts? Atutahi 09:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless, I thank you for not proposing a speedy deletion and giving me the time to improve the entry (assuming I can develop a more robust rational).Atutahi 10:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought I'd make one final point, which a friend highlighted - The name TangataWhenua.com may indeed create confusion in that it could lead one to think that the focal point is wholly commercial. "However to the trained eye - i.e. one who has an understanding of indigenous development it is worth it's entry on the grounds of special consideration in terms of indigenous self-determination and self-expression." Atutahi 13:10, 23 January 2007 (UTC) Kia ora me ki roto i kotahitanga (be well, in unity).[reply]

Just wanted to alert you to my comment at User talk:Biruitorul#TangataWhenua.com. However I do agree with Biruitorul -- if you know about Maori culture, there are probably lots of contributions we need you for beyond this one. Wikipedia's contributors tend to be culturually homogenous, and we need all the diversity we can get. Mango juice^talk 15:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, I would relish the opportunity. Have really enjoyed watching Wikipedia grow and appreciate the incredible amounts of work every one contributes. Beautiful. Atutahi 16:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, sorry, I didn't know you were a woman. But anyway, while I suppose no one will be AfD-ing your article for now, let me make a couple of suggestions. First, try putting your article into categories. Second, try linking to it from other articles. And again, I do stand by my earlier point. No doubt this journal is important to the Māori themselves, but in the future, we would hope to see more articles from you on other (I would argue more interesting) aspects of your culture. Biruitorul 23:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tw.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Tw.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Asher196 (talk) 03:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tariana and Pita the the Maori Party Launch 2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tariana and Pita the the Maori Party Launch 2005.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:41, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tariana and Pita at Maori Party Launch 2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tariana and Pita at Maori Party Launch 2005.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:43, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Angeline Greensill article

Kia ora Atutahi. Just to let you know that I am withdrawing my nomination to delete this article. You have done some excellent work at repointing it and it is now much more acceptable. However, I will be keeping an eye on it to ensure that it remains neutral and doesn't return to being a political platform. I have a couple of suggestions for taking it a bit further and I will put these on the talk page.

With respect to your questions about where the different parts of the discussion belong: the AfD discussion is meant to be just about whether the article meets the standards required for any Wikipedia article about a living person; the talk page of the article is for discussions about the content of the article; and this page is for communicating with fellow Wikipedians.

Please also be reasurred that I welcome a greater Māori presence on the English Wikipedia and look forward to much more kōrero - but within the encylcopaedic guidelines. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 05:44, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:44ang.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:44ang.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 09:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:44ang.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:44ang.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 04:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:TangataWhenua.com.gif

Thanks for uploading File:TangataWhenua.com.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:32, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]