User talk:Atulrawat19

This is Atulrawat19's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dinesh Gautam (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube videos are not enough - please demonstrate that the subject has received WP:SIGCOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dinesh Gautam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 14:34, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Atulrawat19, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 14:34, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dinesh Gautam (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yashovardhan Dhanania was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dinesh Gautam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Yashovardhan (talk) 14:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dangal gross

Hi there, this edit didn't make sense to me, so I reverted it. Per the sources in the article this Jan 2017 source says that Dangal grossed ₹730 at that time, and this May 2017 indicates that the film grossed 72.68 crore from its release in China. This figure will likely increase, as well, since it has just been released in China. 730+72.68=802.68. If you have further problems with the figure, you need to open a discussion on the article's talk page to voice your concerns. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:17, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update Bahubali 2 Earnings

The figure crossed 1600 Crores Rs.- Here is the source http://boxofficecollectionreport.com/movies/baahubali-2-box-office-collection-ba hubali-2-total-worldwide-business-income

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dinesh Gautam (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In addition to failing to demonstrate notability, this biography of a living person doesn't adequately use in-line citations. See Help:Footnotes for instructions on how they can be added to the Draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dinesh Gautam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:47, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Indian journalists

- Please do not add the names of people without their own articles, to lists such as List of Indian journalists. Looking at the above, it appears you have tried to write an article on Dinesh Gautam, but this was repeatedly rejected, as your Draft articles failed to demonstrate that he was sufficiently notable. - Arjayay (talk) 09:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]