User talk:Atul Bhattacharyya

Welcome!

Hi, Atul Bhattacharyya. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Aristophanes68 (talk) 18:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of A. Bhattacharyya

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on A. Bhattacharyya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by A. Bhattacharyya|visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 20:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A. Bhattacharyya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuradha Bhattacharyya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:49, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Atul Bhattacharyya, you are invited to the Co-op!

Hi there! Atul Bhattacharyya, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest editing on Wikipedia

This note probably should have been sent to you before as there is the strong appearance of COI editing of a related person at A. Bhattacharyya.

Hello, Atul Bhattacharyya. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article A. Bhattacharyya, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. - Bri (talk) 16:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bri Bri, I think you are talking about adding Asoke Kumar Bhattacharyya as grandfather of A. Bhattacharyya. I read about it in the blog of A. Bhattacharyya. There is also a 'felicitation volume' which contains Asoke Kumar Bhattacharyya's CV and family tree. So I know that he is her grandfather. Secondly, on her facebook, recently, she posted the photo of her mother Chitra Bhattacharyya receiving the Award from the President of India on his behalf. I cannot establish any online citation to prove this except these:

http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/NewsDetail/index/7/10416/An-Author-and-a-Poet-Speaks

(see Q. 2)

http://anuradhabhattacharyya.blogspot.in/2015/04/my-dadu-by-anuradha-bhattacharyya.html

THIS IS THE BOOK IN PRINT: Indian Culture – Multifaceted Research – a Felicitation Volume in Honour of Professor A. K. Bhattacharyya (2015) edited by Prof. Amalendu Chakraborty, former professor of Philosophy, Calcutta University. Gariya Bauddha Samskriti Samsad: Kolkata.

Well, I have an old copy of the book it seems. The volume is available at amazon. Here's the link: http://www.amazon.in/Culture-Multifacet-Researches-Prof-Amalendu-Chakraborty/dp/8180903176/ref=sr_1_5?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1494097270&sr=1-5 My copy has no ISBN. Probably Professor Chakraborty sent it to a regular publisher (Bharatiya Kala Prakashan (2017) afterwards. It includes a paper by Dr. A. Bhattacharyya on Buddhism & Lacan called 'Upaya and the Limits of Love and Knowledge'.

However, the book MY DADU has not been published by her yet. So we can wait.

There is another 'citation needed' which I thought was evident as she is already teaching. So I searched and found a small evidence:

http://journals.sagepub.com/pb-assets/cmscontent/HPY/HPY_Freud_dissertations_list.pdf. It appeared in google search. After downloading the pdf, one has to find her name.

AtulAtul Bhattacharyya (talk) 18:30, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Atul, your comments here miss the mark and make me think you don't appreciate the community's conception of conflict of interest. Did you read any of the material above? This is not at all about the sources you're talking about, awards from the president, or whatever else you commented on. It is about your apparent involvement with the subject of the article. Could you say here, yes or no, do you have a connection to the subject? You don't have to reply with details that would reveal personal information if you don't wish to. - Bri (talk) 19:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We are Bengalis in Chandigarh. I am a student in PEC University of Technology. I follow her posts in facebook and read her poems etc. AtulAtul Bhattacharyya (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bri Bri, Now I have read your COI details. I am not a relative or friend of Anuradha Bhattacharyya. I am not working in any company. Nobody asked me to create this page. I am only a follower of poetry blogs etc. I live in Chandigarh with my parents. So I know A. Bhattacharyya by face, more than I know N. Sahoo and A. Subramanian. They don't live in Chandigarh. But I follow their poetry also. In fact, their pages are available in Wiki.

I thought you wanted to know how I know that A. K. Bhattacharyya is her relative. This I thought because the line about it has been removed from the page. The rest of the information I gathered from her facebook posts. Her father died of heart attack. Then her grandfather died in June. her husband won a national Championship. She writes about her daughter all the time. Then she writes about her upcoming books. All these gave me a picture of her life. On Wiki, whatever cannot be supported with 'reliable sources' can be deleted. So no problem.

Two years ago I was discouraged to create pages unless I can cite 'reliable sources' for the poet's page. So I did not create any other page. If you think I have 'single interest' or something like that, it is because I want to perfect the work I started. Then only I can write about other notable poets.

Anything else? Is a PRINTED BOOK a good reference? You did not explain that to me. And you did not remove the tag from the top of the page. Or delete all the information that is not correctly sourced.

Thank you. AtulAtul Bhattacharyya (talk) 23:27, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Basic questions about editing

You asked a lot of basics above. I recommend either asking at WP:Teahouse, or consulting one of the "how to" guides such as The Missing Manual. Bri (talk) 02:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Bri. I found this: "Only reliable sources hold up to the scrutiny of the Wikipedia community. But what makes a source reliable? To quote from Wikipedia's Identifying reliable sources guideline (shortcut: WP:IRS): "Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for accuracy and for checking the facts." Most international and national newspapers, magazines, and scientific journals put significant resources into avoiding mistakes, to maintain their credibility and readership (and their survival in the face of libel and other lawsuits). On the other hand, an anonymous blogger can feel pretty free to post anything on the Web without worrying about the consequences. The general rule is: "Self-published books, personal Web sites, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources." (Wikipedia:Verifiability)"

Which means the printed book I have mentioned is a reliable source. It is not 'missing' because the one at Amazon is a new edition with the same contents, as shown in the 'about the product'. Only it has changed its name from 'felicitation' to 'commemoration' obviously because AK Bhattacharyya has died.

I am not adding anything else to the page of A. Bhattacharyya. I added 2 citations after you marked the "citation needed" on the page. Now I want to close the chapter. I am removing the COI tag. I will create a page for another poet shortly. And more carefully.

Okay? Thank you for your guidance. AtulAtul Bhattacharyya (talk) 10:52, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bri (talk), have you noticed that the COI tag has reappeared in the A. Bhattacharyya page? If yes, ok. If no, is it possible for you to remove it and edit the page to every other editor's satisfaction?

I am not editing it because the COI tag says I am its major editor. AtulAtul Bhattacharyya (talk) 16:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I did everything to edit the page Anuradha Bhattacharyya with the help of reliable sources, still the page has "multiple issues". PLEASE REMOVE THE TAG.

AtulAtul Bhattacharyya (talk)

|answered=yes

|answered=yes

Answered yes AtulAtul Bhattacharyya (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amaravati Poetic Prism (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add further references that show that the anthology has been written about in depth by multiple reliable, independent publications. This excludes articles based on news releases or where those involved in the anthology have spoken or written about it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amaravati Poetic Prism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Amaravati Poetic Prism, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:32, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK. delete it. Atul Bhattacharyya (talk) 12:59, 5 July 2018 (UTC) Atul[reply]

I found this article on the internet. http://lifeandlegends.com/report-international-multilingual-poets-meet-amaravati-poetic-prism-2017-padmaja-iyengar-paddy/ It says "The latest Amaravati Poetic Prism 2017 has 948 poems in 85 languages contributed by about 500 poets from 67 countries, already recognized as a Record by the India Book of Records and the previous 2016-edition recognized by the Limca Book of Records." Atul Bhattacharyya (talk) 15:23, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Atul[reply]

Hello, Atul Bhattacharyya! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:32, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amaravati Poetic Prism (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

"Renowned" used twice in the same sentence?!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amaravati Poetic Prism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Amaravati Poetic Prism, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 14:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amaravati Poetic Prism

Hello, Atul Bhattacharyya. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amaravati Poetic Prism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Mjs1991 (talk) 08:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can't help it. Let it be deleted. Atul Bhattacharyya (talk) 13:51, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Begocc. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been disallowed by an edit filter as they did not appear constructive. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you believe the edit filter disallowance was a false positive, please report it here. Feel free to ask for assistance at the Teahouse whenever you like. Thank you. begocc ^questions? 12:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added new novel by the same author Atul Bhattacharyya (talk) 12:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anuradha Bhattacharyya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anuradha Bhattacharyya, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuradha Bhattacharyya (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]