User talk:Attmcb
|
September 2009
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Lea Michele has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Lvd-EsjoiM&feature=player_embedded#t=167 (matching the regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:40, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
June 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Lea Michele do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://i997.photobucket.com/albums/af100/gleestuff/97173717.jpg. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:26, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
July 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Lea Michele has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 17:37, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lea Michele. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 18:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Lea Michele. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Active Banana ( bananaphone 16:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
November 2010
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Lea Michele, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Yves (talk) 07:28, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Normal lm01-19 (2).jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Normal lm01-19 (2).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 22:43, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
July 2011
[edit]
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Chris Colfer worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 23:17, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Lea Michele. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 14:07, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Lea Michele article — reversion and suppression of edits
[edit]Hi. Please be aware that a series of edits which you made to the article on Lea Michele have been reverted. There is no direct indication on the realty site you cited as a source to indicate that this was, in fact, Lea Michele's house. The apparent resemblance of this house to the house shown in the already-cited Daily Mail article is not sufficient here; any attempt to conclude on this basis alone that this is/was Lea Michele's house, or that Lea Michele just sold her house, runs afoul of Wikipedia's prohibition on synthesizing information from multiple sources (see WP:SYNTH).
Further, the page on the realty site gives the address of the home in question — thus implying that this is (or was until just recently) Lea Michele's home address. Again, such a conclusion is not acceptable per WP:SYNTH. And even if Lea Michele's home address were clearly and unambiguously given in the cited web page (which is not the case here), our "Biographies of Living Persons" policy (WP:BLP) generally prohibits inclusion of such material in a Wikipedia article (see WP:BLPPRIVACY).
For these reasons, I have reverted (undone) the above edits to the article. Additionally, I have suppressed (expunged) the material in question, per Wikipedia's "Oversight" policy (see WP:OS) — which means it will not be visible in the article's revision history to anyone at all (except for a small group of trusted users on Wikipedia's Oversight team).
I would recommend you read the BLP policy carefully and make sure your future editing work conforms to this policy. I would also encourage you to review Wikipedia's policies regarding reliable sources (WP:RS) and avoidance of original research (WP:NOR). If you have any questions or concerns about any of this, please feel free to post them here (I will be following your talk page), or if you would prefer, you can send me e-mail via the "email user" link on my user page. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 17:23, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Given that you've reinstated the material which I objected to above, I've brought this issue to the attention of the "Biographies of Living Persons Noticeboard" (WP:BLP/N) for community input (see here). I acknowledge that the two photos in question may very likely be of the same house, but they are not "the same picture". And my other point, about inappropriately revealing a possible or likely residence address for Lea Michele, still stands; in my opinion, this violates WP:BLPPRIVACY. If you still disagree with me, I recommend you comment as you see fit on the BLP noticeboard. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 19:40, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Attmcb. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Attmcb. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Continuing attempts to remove Cory Monteith from the Lea Michele article
[edit]Attmcb, you have made a number of attempts to remove the information about Lea Michele's relationship with Cory Monteith from the Lea Michele article, the latest a short while ago. Every time you try, the material is restored, generally by reverting what you have done. The edit summaries given make it clear that your view of why the material should be removed is not shared by other editors.
If you truly feel the material needs to be removed, you will first need to convince the editing community at large that your view of the matter makes sense in view of various Wikipedia guidelines about appropriate personal material in biographies of living persons. You should do this by posting at Talk:Lea Michele. At the moment, given the number of different editors who have undone your edits, the consensus is clearly that the material belongs in the article. If you continue to remove it against consensus, it could lead to you being blocked from editing, or even disallowed from editing the article altogether. I hope you'll open a conversation at the article's talk page; it's the best way forward. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:42, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Attmcb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Attmcb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Final warning about your renewed efforts to remove all mention of Cory Monteith from Lea Michele
[edit]Attmcb, about a year ago, after you made a number of attempts to remove the information about Lea Michele's relationship with Cory Monteith from the Lea Michele article. As I pointed out at the time, every time you try, the material is restored, generally by reverting what you have done. The edit summaries given make it clear that your view of why the material should be removed has not been shared by other editors.
It is up to you to be a responsible Wikipedia editor and post the reasons at Talk:Lea Michele why you believe that Monteith was not a notable figure in Michele's life and therefore should be removed. You'll need to convince others, and the only way to do that is to start a conversation and hope to gain a consensus that the material should be removed.
If you attempt to remove that material again before gaining that consensus, it will be considered disruptive behavior, and reported to the administrators' noticeboard for action. It is very possible that you will be either blocked or prevented from editing the Lea Michele article in future.
I hope you will be willing to either post your points at the article's talk page, or cease your attempts to remove Monteith from the article. Thank you for your consideration. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:41, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Over the course of a year and a half, you have removed the section 6 times. You've been reverted 6 times by multiple editors. It is time to either drop it or take the issue to an appropriate venue. - SummerPhDv2.0 17:02, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2023
[edit] Hello, I'm Cerebral726. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lea Michele without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Do not remove the section about her literacy without consensus. Cerebral726 (talk) 21:12, 8 December 2023 (UTC)